Surgical endoscopy · 2000
Perforating appendicitis. An indication for laparoscopy?
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Paya K, Rauhofer U, Rebhandl W, Deluggi S, Horcher E
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This pilot study was performed to reassess the widespread postulate that laparoscopic surgery is contraindicated in cases of perforating appendicitis.
METHODS: A total of 75 children (appendiceal perforation: n = 67; perityphlic abscesses and peritonitis: n = 8) were analyzed in a prospective nonrandomized trial. Ten of them were treated by laparoscopic appendectomy.
RESULTS: In the laparoscopy group, both pain and hospitalization were less time-consuming (i.e., by 50% and 19%, respectively). Antibiotics use was down from 2.6 over 6 days to 2.2. over 5.5 days, while the duration of surgery was up by 52%. Wound healing disturbances occurred in 10% (n = 1) and postoperative fever in 50% (n = 5) of patients, compared to 14% (n = 9) and 15% (n = 10) in the group treated by open surgery. All severe complications requiring reintervention (10%; massive subcutaneous abscess, n = 3; retrocolic abscess, n = 2; adhesion-related ileus, n = 3; appendicular stump, n = 1) were associated with open surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: There was not a single major complication in the laparoscopy group. These unexpected results are in contrast to previous reports and have prompted us to initiate a prospective randomized trial.
METHODS: A total of 75 children (appendiceal perforation: n = 67; perityphlic abscesses and peritonitis: n = 8) were analyzed in a prospective nonrandomized trial. Ten of them were treated by laparoscopic appendectomy.
RESULTS: In the laparoscopy group, both pain and hospitalization were less time-consuming (i.e., by 50% and 19%, respectively). Antibiotics use was down from 2.6 over 6 days to 2.2. over 5.5 days, while the duration of surgery was up by 52%. Wound healing disturbances occurred in 10% (n = 1) and postoperative fever in 50% (n = 5) of patients, compared to 14% (n = 9) and 15% (n = 10) in the group treated by open surgery. All severe complications requiring reintervention (10%; massive subcutaneous abscess, n = 3; retrocolic abscess, n = 2; adhesion-related ileus, n = 3; appendicular stump, n = 1) were associated with open surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: There was not a single major complication in the laparoscopy group. These unexpected results are in contrast to previous reports and have prompted us to initiate a prospective randomized trial.