Heart, lung & circulation · 2023
Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bagheri Jamshid, Jameie Mana, Saryazdi Zahra Dehghani, Jalali Arash, Rezaee Malihe, Pashang Mina, Aein Afsaneh, Hosseini Kaveh, Ahmadi Tafti Seyed Hossein, Bagheri Amin
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is associated with adverse outcomes following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) among patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
METHODS: Patients presenting with acute STEMI who underwent CABG between September 2015 and November 2020 were included. Among 354 patients, 222 (62.7%) underwent PPCI prior to CABG (PPCI+CABG group) and were compared with the rest of the patients (CABG only group). The effects of PPCI on primary endpoints---including in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), and bleeding events---were investigated using the stabilised inverse probability weighting method (S-IPW). Further, in-hospital mortality in various PPCI subgroups was analysed using univariable regression.
RESULTS: Patients with and without PPCI were comparable regarding their baseline and surgical characteristics, except that those without PPCI were more likely to have left-main disease (29.5% vs 16.2%, p-value=0.003). Among the PPCI+CABG group, 3.6% mortality and 55.9% bleeding events occurred, and the LOS was 7 [5-10] days. The respective figures for the CABG only group were 4.5%, 50.8%, and 7 [6-10.5] days. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention, as a whole, was not significantly associated with either morality (S-IPW odds ratio (S-IPW OR) 0.61; p=0.393), LOS logarithm (S-IPW β -0.050; p=0.403), or bleeding events (S-IPW OR 1.06; p=0.821). Nevertheless, the unadjusted mortality risk was significantly higher in complicated PPCIs compared with the CABG only group (OR 7.50, 95% CI 2.03-27.77); it was also higher among some other PPCI subgroups, albeit non-significantly.
CONCLUSION: This study found that PPCI did not confer additional risk regarding in-hospital mortality, LOS, or bleeding among patients with acute STEMI who underwent CABG. However, some PPCI subgroups, especially those with complicated PPCI, were at increased risk.
METHODS: Patients presenting with acute STEMI who underwent CABG between September 2015 and November 2020 were included. Among 354 patients, 222 (62.7%) underwent PPCI prior to CABG (PPCI+CABG group) and were compared with the rest of the patients (CABG only group). The effects of PPCI on primary endpoints---including in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), and bleeding events---were investigated using the stabilised inverse probability weighting method (S-IPW). Further, in-hospital mortality in various PPCI subgroups was analysed using univariable regression.
RESULTS: Patients with and without PPCI were comparable regarding their baseline and surgical characteristics, except that those without PPCI were more likely to have left-main disease (29.5% vs 16.2%, p-value=0.003). Among the PPCI+CABG group, 3.6% mortality and 55.9% bleeding events occurred, and the LOS was 7 [5-10] days. The respective figures for the CABG only group were 4.5%, 50.8%, and 7 [6-10.5] days. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention, as a whole, was not significantly associated with either morality (S-IPW odds ratio (S-IPW OR) 0.61; p=0.393), LOS logarithm (S-IPW β -0.050; p=0.403), or bleeding events (S-IPW OR 1.06; p=0.821). Nevertheless, the unadjusted mortality risk was significantly higher in complicated PPCIs compared with the CABG only group (OR 7.50, 95% CI 2.03-27.77); it was also higher among some other PPCI subgroups, albeit non-significantly.
CONCLUSION: This study found that PPCI did not confer additional risk regarding in-hospital mortality, LOS, or bleeding among patients with acute STEMI who underwent CABG. However, some PPCI subgroups, especially those with complicated PPCI, were at increased risk.