Patient education and counseling · 2025
Where is the problem to be solved? Problem defining and epistemic uncertainties in shared decision-making.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lu Weiwei
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Physicians and patients apply different but overlapped knowledge in their contexts to define the divergent problems to solve during cancer treatment.
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to identify the knowledge sources of problem defining between physicians and patients in shared decision-making on cancer treatment.
METHODS: This study adopted a divided narrative approach and interviewed 32 cancer patients and their paired 16 physicians from two top hospitals in northwestern China.
RESULTS: Physicians defined problems by five types of knowledge sources structured in the social system and patients defined problems by five types of knowledge sources grounded in the individual system.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Physicians and patients draw knowledge to define problems through asymmetric social mechanisms, which demonstrates the structural and cultural barriers to reaching mutual understanding and trust. However, a shared definition of the problem emerges from epistemic uncertainties in physician-patient interaction. Problem defining unfolds a chain of problems in shared decision-making, which can be potentially solved through narrative exchange at macro, meso, and micro levels.
PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This study suggests that, in shared decision-making, physicians can pay more attention to the cultural aspects of patients' problem-defining narratives, while patients can be more aware of the social structural aspects of physicians' problem-defining narratives.
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to identify the knowledge sources of problem defining between physicians and patients in shared decision-making on cancer treatment.
METHODS: This study adopted a divided narrative approach and interviewed 32 cancer patients and their paired 16 physicians from two top hospitals in northwestern China.
RESULTS: Physicians defined problems by five types of knowledge sources structured in the social system and patients defined problems by five types of knowledge sources grounded in the individual system.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Physicians and patients draw knowledge to define problems through asymmetric social mechanisms, which demonstrates the structural and cultural barriers to reaching mutual understanding and trust. However, a shared definition of the problem emerges from epistemic uncertainties in physician-patient interaction. Problem defining unfolds a chain of problems in shared decision-making, which can be potentially solved through narrative exchange at macro, meso, and micro levels.
PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This study suggests that, in shared decision-making, physicians can pay more attention to the cultural aspects of patients' problem-defining narratives, while patients can be more aware of the social structural aspects of physicians' problem-defining narratives.