Spinal cord · 2011
Employment after paraplegia in India: a postal survey.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gupta N, Solomon J, Raja K
Аннотация
STUDY DESIGN: This study was carried out as a postal survey.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to ascertain employment after paraplegia in India.
SETTING: This study was conducted in India.
METHODS: The study was conducted by means of a questionnaire. This questionnaire was mailed to the identified individuals (n=600) on the addresses obtained from the medical records section of hospitals and from various organisations. Data analysis was carried out by using descriptives.
RESULTS: The return rate was 46% (276/600) and the employment rate was 41% (114/276). Among 114 subjects who were employed, 68 (59.6%) were living in centres run by armed force and 46 (40.4%) were living in specialised centres or under the region of non-governmental organisations.
CONCLUSIONS: Individuals who were employed were living either in centres run by armed force or in specialised centres. None of the individuals living in community was employed.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to ascertain employment after paraplegia in India.
SETTING: This study was conducted in India.
METHODS: The study was conducted by means of a questionnaire. This questionnaire was mailed to the identified individuals (n=600) on the addresses obtained from the medical records section of hospitals and from various organisations. Data analysis was carried out by using descriptives.
RESULTS: The return rate was 46% (276/600) and the employment rate was 41% (114/276). Among 114 subjects who were employed, 68 (59.6%) were living in centres run by armed force and 46 (40.4%) were living in specialised centres or under the region of non-governmental organisations.
CONCLUSIONS: Individuals who were employed were living either in centres run by armed force or in specialised centres. None of the individuals living in community was employed.