Does molar distalization by the Beneslider have skeletal and dental impacts? A prospective 3D analysis.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to clarify (1) the effect of the Beneslider distalization appliance on maxillary molars (M1+2), (2) the type of tooth movement, and (3) changes in skeletal parameters.

STUDY

DESIGN

Dental distalization paths and transversal changes were measured according to the distance of the pterygoid vertical as well as on the virtualized 3D plaster model.

RESULTS

Distalization of the second premolar (P2; T1 - T2) was 2.51 mm (±1.81 mm; P < .001) combined with a distal tipping of 6.50° (±5.09°; P < .001), whereas for M1 a distalization of 3.49 mm (±1.10 mm) occurred with negligible tipping (0.73° ± 5.04°). No significant differences (T1 - T2) on sagittal and vertical skeletal variables were found within or between G1+2. In contrast, a significant increase in N-Sp' in G2 and in Sp'-Gn in G1+2 with consecutive Hasund index reduction was shown. Comparing T1 and T2, the device had an effect on the transversal development.

CONCLUSION

The Beneslider distalization appliance causes an effective distalization of M1+2, with slight second premolar tipping. No modification of skeletal parameters was recorded, but a relevant effect on Hasund index and the transverse was found.