Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB) · 2024
Errors in manual radiotherapy treatment procedures and their evolution in a low resource setting: Uganda's experience.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Komakech Ignatius, Okello Denis, Kavuma Awusi, Orem Jackson, Tagoe Samuel Nii Adu, Wygoda Annette
Аннотация
PURPOSE: In Uganda, two-dimensional (2D) radiotherapy treatments have been in use since the establishment of radiotherapy in 1995. Preliminary investigations of treatment records in November 2019 showed evidence of gaps requiring urgent attention. The purpose of this study was to improve the safety of the treatments.
METHODS: Records of 1164 patients treated in 1387 courses (1412 sites) on Cobalt-60 units were reviewed todetermine the frequency and dosimetric implications of events that occurred at different stepsof the radiotherapy process. The results were presented and discussed with the differentprofessionals for learning purposes.
RESULTS: Most common dosimetric eventswere omission of block tray, bolus and couch transmission factors in time calculations, incorrect field sizes and depths, wrong beam weighting, independent calculations and prescription doses contributing 28.6 %, 10.1 %, 6.0 %,11.9 %, 10.1 %, 5.4 %, 4.8 % and 8.9 % to the 168 observed errors. Comparison of the calculated treatment doses with the prescribed doses showed that 88 % of the 1412 sites were treated with radiation doses within an accuracy of ± 5 %. However, an analysis of the evolution along the years demonstrated an improvement from 82.8 % in 2018 to 86.1 % in 2019, and 93.2 % in 2020. Most common procedural events were incomplete setup instructions and missing patient data in the record and verify system of the Co-60 units for 57 % and 60.1 % of the 1164 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Opportunities for improvement of safety in the delivery of radiotherapy treatments were identified. Learning from these past errors should raise awareness in the team leading to a safer treatments.
METHODS: Records of 1164 patients treated in 1387 courses (1412 sites) on Cobalt-60 units were reviewed todetermine the frequency and dosimetric implications of events that occurred at different stepsof the radiotherapy process. The results were presented and discussed with the differentprofessionals for learning purposes.
RESULTS: Most common dosimetric eventswere omission of block tray, bolus and couch transmission factors in time calculations, incorrect field sizes and depths, wrong beam weighting, independent calculations and prescription doses contributing 28.6 %, 10.1 %, 6.0 %,11.9 %, 10.1 %, 5.4 %, 4.8 % and 8.9 % to the 168 observed errors. Comparison of the calculated treatment doses with the prescribed doses showed that 88 % of the 1412 sites were treated with radiation doses within an accuracy of ± 5 %. However, an analysis of the evolution along the years demonstrated an improvement from 82.8 % in 2018 to 86.1 % in 2019, and 93.2 % in 2020. Most common procedural events were incomplete setup instructions and missing patient data in the record and verify system of the Co-60 units for 57 % and 60.1 % of the 1164 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Opportunities for improvement of safety in the delivery of radiotherapy treatments were identified. Learning from these past errors should raise awareness in the team leading to a safer treatments.