DOI 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.11.011
Simple fundoplication versus additional vagotomy and pyloroplasty in neurologically impaired children--a single centre experience.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Gastrooesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a significant problem in children with neurological impairment (NI) with high failure rates for fundoplication. Fundoplication with vagotomy and pyloroplasty (FVP) can improve the outcome by altering the sensory or motor dysfunction associated with the reflux. We report our comparative outcomes for simple fundoplication (SF) and FVP in NI children.
METHODS
Case records of all patients having fundoplication under a single consultant at a tertiary UK paediatric surgical centre between January 1997 and December 2012 were retrospectively assessed for recurrent symptoms and redo surgery. The data were collected using a Microsoft Excel database and analysed on Graphpad prism software program. Data are median (range). P value<0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS
Data were available for 244 out of 275 patients who underwent fundoplication during this period (157 SF and 87 FVP). Neurological disease or known syndromes were recorded in 158 patients. Thirty-five children had congenital anatomical abnormalities. Laparoscopic fundoplication was done in 37 cases. Revisional surgery for recurrent symptoms was performed in 22 patients. In the neurologically normal children, all of whom had SF, the revision rate was 6.5%. In the NI children the revision rates were 18.5% for SF and 3.9% for FVP, respectively (Fisher's exact, P<0.05). The median time to redo surgery was 10 (1-63) months, and the median time to follow up was 19.5 (2-177) months.
CONCLUSIONS
There appears to be a significantly lower need for redo surgery following FVP than SF in children with NI.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.