DOI 10.1097/eja.0000000000000448
Effect of head position on laryngeal visualisation with the McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope in paediatric patients: A randomised controlled trial.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
The McGrath MAC video laryngoscope can improve visualisation of the glottis compared with the Macintosh direct laryngoscope. However, good visualisation of the glottis does not guarantee rapid or successful intubation because of difficulty in handling the McGrath device.
OBJECTIVE
We evaluated the effect of head elevation, aligning the positions of the external auditory meatus and sternal notch in the horizontal plane, on visualisation of the glottis and handling of the McGrath laryngoscope in paediatric patients.
DESIGN
A randomised controlled trial.
SETTING
The operating rooms of our tertiary care hospital.
PATIENTS: Forty-six children, American Society of Anaesthesiologists' physical status 1 or 2, aged 3 to 7 years.
INTERVENTION: Videolaryngoscopy using the McGrath device was performed with the head either flat or elevated.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The percentage of glottis opening score, the use of optimisation manoeuvre and time to successful tracheal intubation were recorded.
RESULTS
The median (IQR) percentage of glottis opening score was higher after head elevation than when the head was flat in all patients [100 (100 to 100)% vs. 100 (90 to 100)%, P = 0.0001). The need for use of optimisation procedures (50 vs. 9%, P = 0.004) and mean (SD) time to intubation (17 ± 4 s vs. 15 ± 3 s, P = 0.008) were lower in the head-elevated group.
CONCLUSION
Visualisation of the glottis and handling of the McGrath MAC video laryngoscope were significantly better when the external auditory meatus and sternal notch were aligned in the horizontal plane.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://cris.nih.go.kridentifier:KCT0001443.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.