Disability and rehabilitation · 2000
Cross-sectional comparison of nerve conduction and vibration threshold testing: do screening tools for occupationally induced cumulative trauma disorders result in differing outcomes?
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Winn F J, Morrissey S J, Huechtker E D
Аннотация
PURPOSE/METHOD: Early diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) is essential for its effective treatment and subsequent reduction or prevention of the personal and economic losses associated with it. This paper describes a comparison of vibration threshold testing (VTT) and nerve conduction testing (NCT) within the same subjects.
RESULTS: Across age and diagnostic category there was little difference between VTT results and the NCT velocity measure in their ability to identify individuals with CTS.
CONCLUSION: This is important because VTT is more easily administered and tolerated than NCT and can be used in general screening studies to identify potential CTS cases.
RESULTS: Across age and diagnostic category there was little difference between VTT results and the NCT velocity measure in their ability to identify individuals with CTS.
CONCLUSION: This is important because VTT is more easily administered and tolerated than NCT and can be used in general screening studies to identify potential CTS cases.