MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.6061/clinics/2015(03)05

Медицинская библиотека · Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2015

Outcomes of carotid artery stenting at a high-volume Brazilian interventional neuroradiology center.

Castro-Afonso Luis Henrique de, Nakiri Guilherme Seizem, Monsignore Lucas Moretti, Santos Daniela dos, Camilo Millene Rodrigues, Dias Francisco Antunes, Cougo-Pinto Pedro Telles, Barreira Clara Monteiro Antunes, Alessio-Alves Frederico Fernandes, Fábio Soraia Ramos Cabette, Pontes-Neto Octávio Marques, Abud Daniel Giansante

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

Carotid artery stenting is an emerging revascularization alternative to carotid endarterectomy. However, guidelines have recommended carotid artery stenting only if the rate of periprocedural stroke or death is < 6% among symptomatic patients and < 3% among asymptomatic patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare clinical outcomes of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients who had undergone carotid artery stenting as a first-intention treatment.

METHOD: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent carotid artery stenting by our interventional neuroradiology team was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups: symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The primary endpoints were ipsilateral ischemic stroke, ipsilateral parenchymal hemorrhage and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events at 30 days. The secondary endpoints included ipsilateral ischemic stroke, ipsilateral parenchymal hemorrhage, ipsilateral transient ischemic attack and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events between the 1- and 12-month follow-ups.

RESULTS

A total of 200 consecutive patients were evaluated. The primary endpoints obtained in the symptomatic vs. asymptomatic groups were ipsilateral stroke (2.4% vs. 2.7%, p = 1.00), ipsilateral parenchymal hemorrhage (0.8% vs. 0.0%, p = 1.00) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (4.7% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.71). The secondary endpoints obtained in the symptomatic vs. asymptomatic groups were ipsilateral ischemic stroke (0.0% vs. 0.0%), ipsilateral parenchymal hemorrhage (0.0% vs. 0.0%), ipsilateral TIA (0.0% vs. 0.0%, p = 1.00) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (11.2% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective study, carotid artery stenting was similarly safe and effective when performed as a first-intention treatment in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The study results comply with the safety requirements from current recommendations to perform carotid artery stenting as an alternative treatment to carotid endarterectomy.

Для цитирования: Castro-Afonso Luis Henrique de, Nakiri Guilherme Seizem, Monsignore Lucas Moretti, Santos Daniela dos, Camilo Millene Rodrigues, Dias Francisco Antunes, Cougo-Pinto Pedro Telles, Barreira Clara Monteiro Antunes, Alessio-Alves Frederico Fernandes, Fábio Soraia Ramos Cabette, Pontes-Neto Octávio Marques, Abud Daniel Giansante. Outcomes of carotid artery stenting at a high-volume Brazilian interventional neuroradiology center.. Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil). 2015. DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2015(03)05.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.