MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.cgh.2025.07.025

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2025

Comparative Effectiveness of Tofacitinib vs Upadacitinib for the Treatment of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis.

Honap Sailish, St-Pierre Joelle, Colwill Michael, Patel Kamal, Le Berre Catherine, Caron Bénédicte, Nogami Akira, Kobayashi Taku, Altwegg Romain, Laharie David, Hebuterne Xavier, Nachury Maria, Roblin Xavier, Uzzan Mathieu, Kotze Paulo Gustavo, Lukáš Milan, Vieujean Sophie, D'Amico Ferdinando, Albshesh Ahmad, Guillo Lucas, Fumery Mathurin, Nancey Stephane, Ye Byong Duk, Bergemalm Daniel, Halfvarson Jonas, Buisson Anthony, Karmiris Konstantinos, Rubin David T, Vicaut Eric, Peyrin-Biroulet Laurent, ATTRACT Study Group

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Tofacitinib and upadacitinib are Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors that are increasingly used for the treatment of acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). However, comparative analyses of safety and effectiveness have not been performed for their use in this setting.

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective study enrolled hospitalized adult patients treated with tofacitinib or upadacitinib for ASUC between January 2019 and June 2024. The main outcomes were clinical response, clinical remission, and colectomy-free survival. Propensity-adjusted analyses using inverse probability treatment weighting, and double robust estimations were used to control for confounding factors.

RESULTS

In total, 111 patients (60 tofacitinib, 51 upadacitinib) were enrolled across 23 international centers. JAK inhibitors were used to induce response in 86 patients (77%) and used to maintain response after adequate intravenous steroid response in 25 (23%). The median follow up was 31 weeks (interquartile range, 13-64 weeks). Between days 3 and 7 after treatment initiation, upadacitinib was associated with greater response rates (84% vs 54%; P = .02), but response/remission was comparable at day 98 (45%/36% vs 55%/48%) and day 182 (29/29% vs 39/34%). Sub-analyses for JAK inhibitor use as salvage therapy (tofacitinib [n = 35] vs upadacitinib [n = 31]) showed similar effectiveness outcomes across both groups. The probabilities of colectomy-free survival at days 98 and 182 for tofacitinib and upadacitinib were 79% and 75% and 80% and 78%, respectively, with no significant differences in the comparison of survival curves (P = .99). Treatment failure rates (where JAK inhibitors were used to maintain remission) were similar at days 98 and 182. The frequency of adverse events was comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

Tofacitinib and upadacitinib appear to have similar effectiveness and safety profiles when used for the treatment of ASUC.

Для цитирования: Honap Sailish, St-Pierre Joelle, Colwill Michael, Patel Kamal, Le Berre Catherine, Caron Bénédicte, Nogami Akira, Kobayashi Taku, Altwegg Romain, Laharie David, Hebuterne Xavier, Nachury Maria, Roblin Xavier, Uzzan Mathieu, Kotze Paulo Gustavo, Lukáš Milan, Vieujean Sophie, D'Amico Ferdinando, Albshesh Ahmad, Guillo Lucas, Fumery Mathurin, Nancey Stephane, Ye Byong Duk, Bergemalm Daniel, Halfvarson Jonas, Buisson Anthony, Karmiris Konstantinos, Rubin David T, Vicaut Eric, Peyrin-Biroulet Laurent, ATTRACT Study Group. Comparative Effectiveness of Tofacitinib vs Upadacitinib for the Treatment of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis.. Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2025.07.025.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.