MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000504609

Медицинская библиотека · Psychotherapy and psychosomatics · 2019

Effect of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Insomnia: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.

Wang Hong-Xing, Wang Li, Zhang Wen-Rui, Xue Qing, Peng Mao, Sun Zhi-Chao, Li Li-Ping, Wang Kun, Yang Xiao-Tong, Jia Yu, Zhou Qi-Lin, Xu Zhe-Xue, Li Ning, Dong Kai, Zhang Qian, Song Hai-Qing, Zhan Shu-Qin, Min Bao-Quan, Fan Chun-Qiu, Zhou Ai-Hong, Guo Xiu-Hua, Li Hai-Bin, Liang Li-Rong, Yin Lu, Si Tian-Mei, Huang Jing, Yan Tian-Yi, Cosci Fiammetta, Kamiya Atsushi, Lu Jie, Wang Yu-Ping

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Not all adults with chronic insomnia respond to the recommended therapeutic options of cognitive behavioral therapy and approved hypnotic drugs. Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) may offer a novel potential treatment modality for insomnia.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of tACS for treating adult patients with chronic insomnia.

METHODS

Sixty-two participants with chronic primary insomnia received 20 daily 40-min, 77.5-Hz, 15-mA sessions of active or sham tACS targeting the forehead and both mastoid areas in the laboratory on weekdays for 4 consecutive weeks, followed by a 4-week follow-up period. The primary outcome was response rate measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) at week 8. Secondary outcomes were remission rate, insomnia severity, sleep onset latency (SOL), total sleep time (TST), sleep efficiency, sleep quality, daily disturbances, and adverse events at the end of the 4-week intervention and at the 4-week follow-up.

RESULTS

Of 62 randomized patients, 60 completed the trial. During the 4-week intervention, 1 subject per group withdrew due to loss of interest and time restriction, respectively. Based on PSQI, at 4-week follow-up, the active group had a higher response rate compared to the sham group (53.4% [16/30] vs. 16.7% [5/30], p = 0.009), but remission rates were not different between groups. At the end of the 4-week intervention, the active group had higher response and remission rates than the sham group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.026, respectively). During the trial, compared with the sham group, the active group showed a statistically significant decrease in PSQI total score, a shortened SOL, an increased TST, improved sleep efficiency, and improved sleep quality (p < 0.05 or p < 0.001). Post hoc analysis revealed that, in comparison with the sham group, the active group had improved symptoms, except for daily disturbances, at the end of the 4-week intervention, and significant improvements in all symptoms at the 4-week follow-up. No adverse events or serious adverse responses occurred during the study.

CONCLUSION

The findings show that the tACS applied in the present study has potential as an effective and safe intervention for chronic insomnia within 8 weeks.

Для цитирования: Wang Hong-Xing, Wang Li, Zhang Wen-Rui, Xue Qing, Peng Mao, Sun Zhi-Chao, Li Li-Ping, Wang Kun, Yang Xiao-Tong, Jia Yu, Zhou Qi-Lin, Xu Zhe-Xue, Li Ning, Dong Kai, Zhang Qian, Song Hai-Qing, Zhan Shu-Qin, Min Bao-Quan, Fan Chun-Qiu, Zhou Ai-Hong, Guo Xiu-Hua, Li Hai-Bin, Liang Li-Rong, Yin Lu, Si Tian-Mei, Huang Jing, Yan Tian-Yi, Cosci Fiammetta, Kamiya Atsushi, Lu Jie, Wang Yu-Ping. Effect of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Insomnia: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.. Psychotherapy and psychosomatics. 2019. DOI: 10.1159/000504609.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.