European journal of ophthalmology · 2006
Inferior turbinate fracture and congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Attarzadeh Ab, Sajjadi M, Owji N, Reza Talebnejad M, Farvardin M, Attarzadeh Ad
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the success rate of probing combined with inferior turbinate fracture in comparison with simple probing as a first attempt in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children.
METHODS: In a prospective interventional case-control study, 86 eyes from 61 children older than 6 months with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction underwent surgical intervention. Forty-two eyes of 33 patients underwent probing combined with infracturing of the inferior turbinate and 44 eyes of 28 patients underwent simple probing. The outcome evaluation included a standard ophthalmologic examination plus a dye disappearance test 2 months after the surgical intervention.
RESULTS: In the case group (probing + infracture of the inferior turbinate), the results were good in 22 (66.7%) patients, fair in 8 (24.2%), and poor in 3 (9.1%). In the control group (simple probing), the results were good in 20 (71.4%) patients, fair in 3 (10.7%), and poor in 5 (17.9%) (p=0.9). Success rates were 91% and 82% in the case and control groups, respectively (p=0.4).
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of this study, infracturing of the inferior turbinate does not increase the success rate of simple probing as a first attempt.
METHODS: In a prospective interventional case-control study, 86 eyes from 61 children older than 6 months with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction underwent surgical intervention. Forty-two eyes of 33 patients underwent probing combined with infracturing of the inferior turbinate and 44 eyes of 28 patients underwent simple probing. The outcome evaluation included a standard ophthalmologic examination plus a dye disappearance test 2 months after the surgical intervention.
RESULTS: In the case group (probing + infracture of the inferior turbinate), the results were good in 22 (66.7%) patients, fair in 8 (24.2%), and poor in 3 (9.1%). In the control group (simple probing), the results were good in 20 (71.4%) patients, fair in 3 (10.7%), and poor in 5 (17.9%) (p=0.9). Success rates were 91% and 82% in the case and control groups, respectively (p=0.4).
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of this study, infracturing of the inferior turbinate does not increase the success rate of simple probing as a first attempt.