MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2005.00284.x

Медицинская библиотека · Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2005

Microbiological analysis of chronic dacryocystitis.

Sun Xuguang, Liang Qingfeng, Luo Shiyun, Wang Zhiqun, Li Ran, Jin Xiuying

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

AIMS: To investigate the microbiology of specimens from patients with chronic dacryocystitis.

METHODS

A total of 100 samples were obtained from the contents of the lacrimal duct in 91 consecutive patients with chronic dacryocystitis, including nine bilateral cases. These samples were cultured for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria and fungi with a routine microbiological technique. Positive cultured isolates were identified.

RESULTS

A total of 180 strains were isolated from the 85 bacterial samples, including 150 strains of aerobic bacteria and 30 strains of anaerobic bacteria. Fungi were found in eight samples and actinomyces in three samples. The bacterial species that were most frequently found were Staphylococcus species, representing 34.5% of all strains, followed by Corynebacterium diphtheroides (15.5%). The sensitivity tests revealed that levo-ofloxacin and amikacin were the most effective antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

Gram positive cocci was the predominant pathogen of chronic dacryocystitis. Levo-ofloxacin and amikacin had the best effect in vitro.

Для цитирования: Sun Xuguang, Liang Qingfeng, Luo Shiyun, Wang Zhiqun, Li Ran, Jin Xiuying. Microbiological analysis of chronic dacryocystitis.. Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists). 2005. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2005.00284.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.