DOI 10.1097/scs.0000000000008566
Indications, Techniques, and Postoperative Outcomes of Temporalis Fascia Grafting in Rhinoplasty.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
To investigate the indication, site, techniques, and complications at the donor and recipient sites of temporalis fascia grafting in rhinoplasty, and patients' satisfaction with the surgical outcomes.
METHODS
This retrospective cohort study was performed at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Saudi Arabia, between January 2015 and January 2020. The predictor variable was the temporalis fascia in different forms. Reported variables comprised individuals' satisfaction, dorsal nasal irregularities, and contour definitions. Moreover, further variables were considered, including age, gender, the reason behind surgery, surgical type, and graft size and site. A rhinoplasty doctor, other than a surgeon, has assessed the dorsal augmentation findings by inspecting and palpating the dorsum. Data analyses were achieved through SPSS.
RESULTS
A total of 69 patients were enrolled in this study; 44.9% of them underwent rhinoplasty with the temporalis fascia in cartilage wrapped by the temporalis fascia form, 43.5% in a blanket form, and 11.6% in a ball form. The average subject satisfaction outcome score was 10.44 preoperatively and 19.72 postoperatively ( P = 0.001).No dorsal irregularities were detected by inspection in all forms of the temporalis fascia, whereas 3 patients with the blanket and 2 patients with the cartilage wrapped by the temporalis fascia had irregularities, which were detected on palpation.
CONCLUSIONS
In rhinoplasty, the temporalis fascia is a favorable choice for nasal reconstruction since it is simple in harvesting and can be made in different forms and shapes for many purposes.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.