Ultrasound accuracy for brachial plexus pathology.

AIM: To determine (a) the accuracy of ultrasound in detecting brachial plexus pathology and (b) outline the advantages and limitations of ultrasound compared to MRI for imaging the brachial plexus.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

cases with clinically suspected brachial plexus pathology were evaluated first by ultrasound, followed by MRI. Patients with prior brachial plexus imaging were excluded. The final diagnosis was based on a combination of ultrasound, MRI, clinical follow-up, and surgical findings. The accuracy of the ultrasound was assessed by comparing the ultrasound and the final diagnoses. The mean clinical follow-up time following ultrasound was 1.8 ± 1.4 years.

RESULTS

Ninety-two (64%) of the 143 cases had normal brachial plexus ultrasound and MRI examinations. Fifty-one (36%) of 143 cases had brachial plexus pathology on MRI, comprising post-radiation fibrosis (n=25, 49%), nerve sheath tumor (n=11, 21%), traumatic injury (n=7, 14%), inflammatory polyneuropathy (n=4, 8%), malignant infiltration (n=2, 4%), desmoid fibromatosis (n=1,2%), and neuralgic amyotrophy (n=1, 2%). Overall diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for brachial plexus pathology was 98% (140/143), with three discordant cases (neuralgic amyotrophy n=1, inflammatory neuropathy n=1, postradiation fibrosis n=1) regarded as normal on ultrasound assessment. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of ultrasound for identifying brachial plexus pathology were 94%, 100%, 100%, and 97%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound identifies brachial plexus pathology with high accuracy and specificity, showing comparable diagnostic efficacy to MRI. Ultrasound can serve as an effective first-line imaging investigation for suspected brachial plexus pathology.