Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia · 2020
Retrospective Analysis of the Impact of Adverse Event-Triggered Idelalisib Interruption and Dose Reduction on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Malignancies.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ma Shuo, Chan Rebecca J, Gu Lin, Xing Guan, Rajakumaraswamy Nishanthan, Ruzicka Bianca B, Wagner-Johnston Nina D
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Idelalisib is a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase δ inhibitor approved for relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma, a type of indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL), and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Idelalisib-triggered adverse events (AEs) may be managed with treatment interruption and/or dose reduction, potentially extending therapy duration and increasing the likelihood of continued response.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Post hoc analyses were conducted to evaluate clinical outcomes after AE-induced idelalisib interruption for 125 patients with iNHL and 283 with CLL.
RESULTS: Progression-free survival (PFS) was longer for patients with iNHL who experienced ≥ 2 interruptions versus those with 0 interruptions who discontinued idelalisib or study because of AEs (hazard ratio 0.33; P = .0212). Both PFS and overall survival were longer for patients with CLL with ≥ 2 interruptions versus 0 interruptions in those who discontinued therapy because of an AE (hazard ratio PFS 0.50, overall survival 0.41; P < .005). Clinical benefits persisted for patients with CLL who experienced treatment interruption after receiving idelalisib for ≥ 6 months. Supplementing interruption with dose reduction did not worsen clinical outcomes. However, time off therapy of ≥ 8% may diminish the clinical benefit of treatment interruption.
CONCLUSION: Idelalisib interruption and dose reduction were associated with enhanced clinical outcomes for patients with relapsed/refractory iNHL or CLL who experienced an AE, supporting this management strategy when indicated.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Post hoc analyses were conducted to evaluate clinical outcomes after AE-induced idelalisib interruption for 125 patients with iNHL and 283 with CLL.
RESULTS: Progression-free survival (PFS) was longer for patients with iNHL who experienced ≥ 2 interruptions versus those with 0 interruptions who discontinued idelalisib or study because of AEs (hazard ratio 0.33; P = .0212). Both PFS and overall survival were longer for patients with CLL with ≥ 2 interruptions versus 0 interruptions in those who discontinued therapy because of an AE (hazard ratio PFS 0.50, overall survival 0.41; P < .005). Clinical benefits persisted for patients with CLL who experienced treatment interruption after receiving idelalisib for ≥ 6 months. Supplementing interruption with dose reduction did not worsen clinical outcomes. However, time off therapy of ≥ 8% may diminish the clinical benefit of treatment interruption.
CONCLUSION: Idelalisib interruption and dose reduction were associated with enhanced clinical outcomes for patients with relapsed/refractory iNHL or CLL who experienced an AE, supporting this management strategy when indicated.