Pediatric blood & cancer · 2013
Ten-year follow-up of pediatric patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated with allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplantation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Giulino-Roth Lisa, Ricafort Rosanna, Kernan Nancy A, Small Trudy N, Trippett Tanya M, Steinherz Peter G, Prockop Susan E, Scaradavou Andromachi, Chiu Michelle, O'Reilly Richard J, Boulad Farid
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (SCT) is often considered in patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) but there are limited data on the use of SCT for the treatment of NHL in the pediatric setting.
PROCEDURE: To evaluate the role of SCT for children with NHL, we reviewed 36 consecutive pediatric patients with NHL who underwent an allogeneic (n = 21) or autologous (n = 15) SCT at our institution between 1982 and 2004. Pathologic classification included: lymphoblastic lymphoma (n = 12), Burkitt lymphoma (BL) (n = 5), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n = 4), anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) (n = 13), peripheral T cell lymphoma (n = 1), and undifferentiated NHL (n = 1). Donor source for allogeneic-SCT recipients was an HLA-matched related donor (n = 15), a matched unrelated donor (n = 4), or a mismatched donor (related n = 1; unrelated n = 1). Twenty-eight patients (78%) had chemotherapy responsive disease at the time of transplant (either CR or PR).
RESULTS: Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 55% and 53% with a median follow-up of 9.75 years. Outcomes were similar in patients receiving autologous and allogeneic-SCT (DFS 53% in both groups). Patients with ALCL had a DFS of 76.9%. In contrast, of five patients transplanted for BL, none survived. DFS among patients with chemotherapy sensitive disease was 61%, compared with 25% among patients with relapsed/refractory disease (P = 0.019).
CONCLUSIONS: Allogeneic and autologous SCT offer the prospect of durable, disease-free survival for a significant proportion of pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory NHL. Survival is superior among patients with chemotherapy sensitive disease.
PROCEDURE: To evaluate the role of SCT for children with NHL, we reviewed 36 consecutive pediatric patients with NHL who underwent an allogeneic (n = 21) or autologous (n = 15) SCT at our institution between 1982 and 2004. Pathologic classification included: lymphoblastic lymphoma (n = 12), Burkitt lymphoma (BL) (n = 5), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n = 4), anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) (n = 13), peripheral T cell lymphoma (n = 1), and undifferentiated NHL (n = 1). Donor source for allogeneic-SCT recipients was an HLA-matched related donor (n = 15), a matched unrelated donor (n = 4), or a mismatched donor (related n = 1; unrelated n = 1). Twenty-eight patients (78%) had chemotherapy responsive disease at the time of transplant (either CR or PR).
RESULTS: Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 55% and 53% with a median follow-up of 9.75 years. Outcomes were similar in patients receiving autologous and allogeneic-SCT (DFS 53% in both groups). Patients with ALCL had a DFS of 76.9%. In contrast, of five patients transplanted for BL, none survived. DFS among patients with chemotherapy sensitive disease was 61%, compared with 25% among patients with relapsed/refractory disease (P = 0.019).
CONCLUSIONS: Allogeneic and autologous SCT offer the prospect of durable, disease-free survival for a significant proportion of pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory NHL. Survival is superior among patients with chemotherapy sensitive disease.