Does Coupling and Positioning in Vibroplasty Matter? A Prospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE

Vibroplasty has offered a new modality of hearing rehabilitation in patients with mixed, conductive, and sensorineural hearing loss who cannot wear hearing aids. Potentially, the positioning of the floating mass transducer (FMT) in vibroplasty surgery has a critical effect on hearing outputs. In this study, the impact on hearing outputs and coupling efficiency are evaluated by comparing various vibroplasty applications in the middle ear. No other study to date has examined the coupling efficiency of round window (RW) versus an ossicular vibroplasty application.

STUDY

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study of patients with underlying ear pathologies who were not able to wear hearing aids.

METHODS

This is an ongoing prospective study of 16 patients. All patients had a standard audiological test battery. Direct drive transfer function analysis results were correlated with bone conduction thresholds to assess the efficiency of the FMT coupling. Speech perception in quiet and quality of life measure questionnaires were used to assess outcomes. Nine patients had round window vibroplasty, six patients had stapes vibroplasty, and one patient had traditional incus vibroplasty.

RESULTS

Patients with a soft tissue coupler between the FMT and the RW had significantly reduced coupling efficiency. Patients who had direct RW contact had significantly improved coupling efficiency. Patients who underwent stapes or incus vibroplasty had the greatest coupling efficiency.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that attachment to the stapes or incus provides the best coupling when compared to round window vibroplasty. When applicable, stapes or incus coupling should be the first choice when implementing vibroplasty.