The New Zealand medical journal · 2016
Achalasia: a 13-year, single-centre experience comparing endoscopic balloon dilatation and laparoscopic Heller myotomy.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Huelsen Alexander, Oumer Ramadan, Ashcroft Anna, Roberts Ross H, Coulter Grant N, Kelly Steven J, Barclay Murray L
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Idiopathic achalasia is a non-curable, primary motility disorder of the oesophagus. Most established long-term palliative treatment options are laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) and endoscopic balloon dilatation (BD).
AIM: We aimed to compare the outcome of both therapies and the risk of serious complications, defined as perforation or death, in a single-centre series.
METHOD: In this retrospective study, patients with BD or LHM were identified from 1997-2010. The symptom score (modified Zaninotto score) before treatment and at time of interview was evaluated via a telephone questionnaire.
RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and treatment was provided with BD-only in 63, surgery-only in 23, BD crossover to surgery in 12, and surgery crossover to BD in one patient. Mean age was 62 years in the BD-only, and 39 years in the surgery-only group. One hundred and fifteen BD were performed on 76 patients with multiple dilatations required in 46 patients (38%). Sixty-four percent of all patients alive (n=81) were interviewed. Satisfactory outcomes were achieved in 79% in the BD group and in 88% in the surgery group, with a mean follow-up of 81 and 69 months, respectively. There was a single perforation in the BD group (0.9%) and no deaths occurred.
CONCLUSION: LHM and on-demand BD were safe and within the limitations of our study design both methods appeared similarly effective treatments for achalasia, resulting in a satisfactory outcome in 88% and 79% of patients with a mean follow-up of 69 and 81 months. Serious complications occurred in less than 1% of procedures and there were no deaths.
AIM: We aimed to compare the outcome of both therapies and the risk of serious complications, defined as perforation or death, in a single-centre series.
METHOD: In this retrospective study, patients with BD or LHM were identified from 1997-2010. The symptom score (modified Zaninotto score) before treatment and at time of interview was evaluated via a telephone questionnaire.
RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and treatment was provided with BD-only in 63, surgery-only in 23, BD crossover to surgery in 12, and surgery crossover to BD in one patient. Mean age was 62 years in the BD-only, and 39 years in the surgery-only group. One hundred and fifteen BD were performed on 76 patients with multiple dilatations required in 46 patients (38%). Sixty-four percent of all patients alive (n=81) were interviewed. Satisfactory outcomes were achieved in 79% in the BD group and in 88% in the surgery group, with a mean follow-up of 81 and 69 months, respectively. There was a single perforation in the BD group (0.9%) and no deaths occurred.
CONCLUSION: LHM and on-demand BD were safe and within the limitations of our study design both methods appeared similarly effective treatments for achalasia, resulting in a satisfactory outcome in 88% and 79% of patients with a mean follow-up of 69 and 81 months. Serious complications occurred in less than 1% of procedures and there were no deaths.