Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2016
Four-dimensional planning for motion synchronized dose delivery in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tachibana Hidenobu, Sawant Amit
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To investigate a weighted four-dimensional (W-4D) treatment planning strategy based on the greater clinical advantage of the conformal over the intensity-modulated technique in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two planning strategies (individual-phase 4D [IP-4D] and W-4D) were evaluated in eighteen lung SBRT patients. The IP-4D plan can deliver a constant fluence during whole respiratory phases. The W-4D plan's key concept was to escalate (or reduce) fluence using a 4D optimization algorithm when the tumour target was out-of-line (or in-line) with an organ-at-risk. The fluence was converted to a dynamic multi-leaf collimator leaf sequence for deliverable 4D irradiation.
RESULTS: In all patients, the W-4D plan enabled planning tumour volume conformity comparable to the IP-4D plan. The W-4D plan yielded a significantly lower maximum dose than the IP-4D plan for the spinal cord (-11%; p<0.01), oesophagus (-14%; p<0.01), heart (-22%; p=0.01) and stomach (-23%; p=0.07), and a lower mean dose to liver (-19%; p=0.18) while maintaining the mean dose to lung (-1%; p=0.23).
CONCLUSIONS: W-4D is a robust, practical planning approach that achieves significant dose sparing relative to non-time-resolved tracking; it may be of greater clinical benefit in radiotherapy than the spatially intensity-modulated 4D approach.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two planning strategies (individual-phase 4D [IP-4D] and W-4D) were evaluated in eighteen lung SBRT patients. The IP-4D plan can deliver a constant fluence during whole respiratory phases. The W-4D plan's key concept was to escalate (or reduce) fluence using a 4D optimization algorithm when the tumour target was out-of-line (or in-line) with an organ-at-risk. The fluence was converted to a dynamic multi-leaf collimator leaf sequence for deliverable 4D irradiation.
RESULTS: In all patients, the W-4D plan enabled planning tumour volume conformity comparable to the IP-4D plan. The W-4D plan yielded a significantly lower maximum dose than the IP-4D plan for the spinal cord (-11%; p<0.01), oesophagus (-14%; p<0.01), heart (-22%; p=0.01) and stomach (-23%; p=0.07), and a lower mean dose to liver (-19%; p=0.18) while maintaining the mean dose to lung (-1%; p=0.23).
CONCLUSIONS: W-4D is a robust, practical planning approach that achieves significant dose sparing relative to non-time-resolved tracking; it may be of greater clinical benefit in radiotherapy than the spatially intensity-modulated 4D approach.