MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2105/ajph.2012.300946

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of public health · 2012

The impact of a free older persons' bus pass on active travel and regular walking in England.

Coronini-Cronberg Sophie, Millett Christopher, Laverty Anthony A, Webb Elizabeth

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

We assessed the potential public health benefit of the National Bus Pass, introduced in 2006, which permits free local bus travel for older adults (≥ 60 years) in England.

METHODS

We performed regression analyses with annual data from the 2005-2008 National Travel Survey. Models assessed associations between being a bus pass holder and active travel (walking, cycling, and use of public transport), use of buses, and walking 3 or more times per week.

RESULTS

Having a free pass was significantly associated with greater active travel among both disadvantaged (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 4.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.35, 4.86; P < .001) and advantaged groups (AOR = 4.72; 95% CI = 3.99, 5.59; P < .001); greater bus use in both disadvantaged and advantaged groups (AOR = 7.03; 95% CI = 5.53, 8.94; P < .001 and AOR = 7.11; 95% CI = 5.65, 8.94; P < .001, respectively); and greater likelihood of walking more frequently in the whole cohort (AOR = 1.15; 95% CI = 1.07, 1.12; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Public subsidies enabling free bus travel for older persons may confer significant population health benefits through increased incidental physical activity.

Для цитирования: Coronini-Cronberg Sophie, Millett Christopher, Laverty Anthony A, Webb Elizabeth. The impact of a free older persons' bus pass on active travel and regular walking in England.. American journal of public health. 2012. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2012.300946.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.