Pediatric diabetes · 2019
Lower HbA1c in patients with type 1 diabetes and celiac disease who reached celiac-specific antibody-negativity-A multicenter DPV analysis.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nagl Katrin, Bollow Esther, Liptay Susanne, Rosenbauer Joachim, Koletzko Sibylle, Pappa Angeliki, Näke Andrea, Fröhlich-Reiterer Elke, Döring Christian, Wolf Johannes, Salfeld Peter, Prinz Nicole
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To study celiac-specific antibody status over 3 years in patients with type 1 diabetes and biopsy-proven celiac disease (T1D + CD). Furthermore, to determine clinical differences after diagnosis between patients reaching constant antibody-negativity (Ab-neg) and staying antibody-positive (Ab-pos).
METHODS: A total of 608 pediatric T1D + CD patients from the multicenter DPV registry were studied longitudinally regarding their CD specific antibody-status. Differences between Ab-neg (n = 218) and Ab-pos (n = 158) patients 3 years after biopsy were assessed and compared with 26 833 T1D patients without CD by linear and logistic regression adjusted for age, gender, diabetes duration and migration background.
RESULTS: Thirty-six percent of T1D + CD patients reached and sustained antibody-negativity 3 years after CD diagnosis. The median time until patients returned to Ab-neg was 0.86 (0.51;1.16) years. Three years after diagnosis, HbA1c was lowest in Ab-neg and highest in Ab-pos patients compared to T1D-only patients (adjusted mean (95%CI): 7.72 (7.51-7.92) % vs 8.44 (8.20-8.68) % vs 8.19 (8.17-8.21) %, adjusted P < 0.001, respectively). Total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and frequency of dyslipidemia were significantly lower in Ab-neg compared to T1D-only patients (167 (161-173) mg/dl vs 179 (178-179) mg/dl, P < .001; 90 (84-96) mg/dl vs 99 (98-99) mg/dl, P = .005; 15.7 (10.5-22.9) % vs 25.9 (25.2-26.6) %, P = .017). In longitudinal analyses over 6 years after diagnosis, a constantly higher HbA1c (P < .001) and a lower height-SDS (P = .044) was observed in Ab-pos compared to Ab-neg patients.
CONCLUSION: Only one third of T1D + CD patients reached constant Ab-negativity after CD diagnosis. Achieving Ab-negativity after diagnosis seems to be associated with better metabolic control and growth, supposedly due to a higher adherence to therapy in general.
METHODS: A total of 608 pediatric T1D + CD patients from the multicenter DPV registry were studied longitudinally regarding their CD specific antibody-status. Differences between Ab-neg (n = 218) and Ab-pos (n = 158) patients 3 years after biopsy were assessed and compared with 26 833 T1D patients without CD by linear and logistic regression adjusted for age, gender, diabetes duration and migration background.
RESULTS: Thirty-six percent of T1D + CD patients reached and sustained antibody-negativity 3 years after CD diagnosis. The median time until patients returned to Ab-neg was 0.86 (0.51;1.16) years. Three years after diagnosis, HbA1c was lowest in Ab-neg and highest in Ab-pos patients compared to T1D-only patients (adjusted mean (95%CI): 7.72 (7.51-7.92) % vs 8.44 (8.20-8.68) % vs 8.19 (8.17-8.21) %, adjusted P < 0.001, respectively). Total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and frequency of dyslipidemia were significantly lower in Ab-neg compared to T1D-only patients (167 (161-173) mg/dl vs 179 (178-179) mg/dl, P < .001; 90 (84-96) mg/dl vs 99 (98-99) mg/dl, P = .005; 15.7 (10.5-22.9) % vs 25.9 (25.2-26.6) %, P = .017). In longitudinal analyses over 6 years after diagnosis, a constantly higher HbA1c (P < .001) and a lower height-SDS (P = .044) was observed in Ab-pos compared to Ab-neg patients.
CONCLUSION: Only one third of T1D + CD patients reached constant Ab-negativity after CD diagnosis. Achieving Ab-negativity after diagnosis seems to be associated with better metabolic control and growth, supposedly due to a higher adherence to therapy in general.