[Comparative study on gait function one year after HURWA robotic-assisted and MAKO robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty based on MediaPipe motion capture].

OBJECTIVE

To systematically assess the differences in gait parameters and clinical efficacy between HURWA robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty(TKA) and MAKO robotic-assisted TKA during the 1-year postoperative follow-up period.

METHODS

From November 2023 to March 2024, 40 patients with unilateral knee osteoarthritis were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups:HURWA robotic-assisted TKA group(HURWA group) and MAKO robotic-assisted TKA group (MAKO group) using a random number table. In the HURWA group, there were 20 patients, comprising 5 males and 15 females, with an age range of 59 to 79 years old with a mean age of (69.45±4.36) years old, and body mass index(BMI) ranging from 22.96 to 33.87 kg·m-2 with a mean BMI of (27.28±3.12) kg·m-2. In the MAKO group, there were also 20 patients, consisting of 4 males and 16 females, with an age range of 58 to 80 years old with an average of (67.50±6.88) years old, BMI ranging from 25.39 to 29.30 kg·m-2 with an average of(26.86 ±1.23) kg·m-2. To comprehensively evaluate the improvement in knee joint function, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) and American Knee Society score (KSS) were used for clinical efficacy evaluation. In gait analysis, an innovative computer vision-based human pose estimation framework, MediaPipe, was used to quantitatively measure the spatiotemporal parameters (such as walking speed, step frequency, stride length, step width, etc.) and kinematic parameters (such as gait cycle, stance time, stance phase, swing time, swing phase, knee joint active flexion angle, etc.) of both groups preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. A dynamic evaluation of the maximum hip flexion and knee flexion angles during functional activities (such as squatting) was also conducted to fully reflect the recovery of patients' motor function.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the WOMAC and KSS scores between the HURWA robotic-assisted TKA group and the MAKO robotic-assisted TKA group preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively (P>0.05). In terms of gait function, there were no significant differences in the spatiotemporal parameters (including walking speed, step frequency, stride length, step width, etc.) and kinematic parameters(such as gait cycle, stance time, stance phase, swing time, swing phase, knee joint active flexion angle, etc.) between the two groups preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively(P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both HURWA robot-assisted TKA and MAKO robot-assisted TKA demoonstrated equivalent outcones in terms of functional recovery and gait improvement 1 year postoperatively.