The British journal of radiology · 2015
Dosimetric effects of roll rotational setup errors on lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy using volumetric modulated arc therapy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lee Jaegi, Kim Jung-In, Ye Sung-Joon, Kim Hak Jae, Carlson Joel, Park Jong Min
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the dosimetric effects of roll-rotational setup errors of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for lung cancer using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).
METHODS: A total of 23 lung SABR cases were evaluated retrospectively. Each of the planning CT images was intentionally rotated by ±1°, ±2° and ±3°. After that, to simulate the translational couch correction, rotated CT images were moved along the x, y and z axis to match the centroid of the target volume in the rotated CT images with that in the original CT images. The differences in D95% and V100% of the target volume, D0.35cc of spinal cord, D0.35cc and D5cc of oesophagus and V20Gy of lung between the original and the rotated CT images were calculated.
RESULTS: The average differences in D95% and V100% of target volume, D0.35cc of spinal cord, D0.35cc and D5cc of oesophagus and V20Gy of lung were -0.3% ± 0.4% and -0.7% ± 2.4%, 1.6 ± 27.9 cGy, -1.6 ± 37.6 cGy, 15.9 ± 25.3 cGy and 0.0% ± 0.1%, respectively. The dosimetric changes in organs at risk (OARs) near the target volume were sometimes considerable due to roll-rotational setup errors, despite the translational correction, and those were patient specific.
CONCLUSION: In the case of coplanar VMAT for lung SABR, dosimetric changes to the target volume due to roll-rotational setup errors could be compensated by translational correction, whereas those to the OARs could not in some cases.
ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Roll-rotational setup errors would increase the dose to OARs despite the translational correction.
METHODS: A total of 23 lung SABR cases were evaluated retrospectively. Each of the planning CT images was intentionally rotated by ±1°, ±2° and ±3°. After that, to simulate the translational couch correction, rotated CT images were moved along the x, y and z axis to match the centroid of the target volume in the rotated CT images with that in the original CT images. The differences in D95% and V100% of the target volume, D0.35cc of spinal cord, D0.35cc and D5cc of oesophagus and V20Gy of lung between the original and the rotated CT images were calculated.
RESULTS: The average differences in D95% and V100% of target volume, D0.35cc of spinal cord, D0.35cc and D5cc of oesophagus and V20Gy of lung were -0.3% ± 0.4% and -0.7% ± 2.4%, 1.6 ± 27.9 cGy, -1.6 ± 37.6 cGy, 15.9 ± 25.3 cGy and 0.0% ± 0.1%, respectively. The dosimetric changes in organs at risk (OARs) near the target volume were sometimes considerable due to roll-rotational setup errors, despite the translational correction, and those were patient specific.
CONCLUSION: In the case of coplanar VMAT for lung SABR, dosimetric changes to the target volume due to roll-rotational setup errors could be compensated by translational correction, whereas those to the OARs could not in some cases.
ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Roll-rotational setup errors would increase the dose to OARs despite the translational correction.