Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE · 2020
Predictors of increase in pacing threshold after transcatheter pacing system implantation due to micro-dislodgement.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Higuchi Motoaki, Shinoda Yasutoshi, Hasegawa Tomoaki, Ishibashi Mayu, Yamada Norihiro, Chiba Yoshiro, Ohira Koji, Murata Minoru, Aonuma Kazutaka
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Achieving a favorable pacing threshold with a Micra transcatheter pacing system (Micra-TPS) is needed to reduce battery depletion. In some cases, the threshold increases shortly after the device is implanted, and a higher pacing threshold may be required. This study aims to identify the causes and predictors of the increase in pacing threshold observed shortly after Micra-TPS implantation.
METHODS: The study included 64 consecutive patients who underwent Micra-TPS implantation between 2017 and 2020. The patients were divided into two groups depending on their pacing threshold: the increased pacing threshold (IPT) group (threshold increased by ≥0.5 V/0.24 ms within 1 month of implantation) and the stable pacing threshold (SPT) group.
RESULTS: Excluding four patients who could not be followed up, of the 60 remaining patients, nine (15%) were in the IPT group and 51 (85%) were in the SPT group. The IPT group had significantly lower implant impedance values and higher implant thresholds than the SPT group (582 ± 59 vs 755 ± 167 Ω [P < .001] and 1.29 ± 0.87 vs 0.71 ± 0.40 V/0.24 ms [P = .014]). Implant impedance and threshold may serve as predictors of a threshold increase after implantation (area under the curve: 0.737-0.943 and 0.586-0.926, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: An IPT was noted shortly after Micra-TPS implantation owing to micro-dislodgement because of insufficient anchoring of the device to the myocardium. Impedance >660 Ω and threshold <1.0 V/0.24 ms may predict an increase in pacing threshold.
METHODS: The study included 64 consecutive patients who underwent Micra-TPS implantation between 2017 and 2020. The patients were divided into two groups depending on their pacing threshold: the increased pacing threshold (IPT) group (threshold increased by ≥0.5 V/0.24 ms within 1 month of implantation) and the stable pacing threshold (SPT) group.
RESULTS: Excluding four patients who could not be followed up, of the 60 remaining patients, nine (15%) were in the IPT group and 51 (85%) were in the SPT group. The IPT group had significantly lower implant impedance values and higher implant thresholds than the SPT group (582 ± 59 vs 755 ± 167 Ω [P < .001] and 1.29 ± 0.87 vs 0.71 ± 0.40 V/0.24 ms [P = .014]). Implant impedance and threshold may serve as predictors of a threshold increase after implantation (area under the curve: 0.737-0.943 and 0.586-0.926, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: An IPT was noted shortly after Micra-TPS implantation owing to micro-dislodgement because of insufficient anchoring of the device to the myocardium. Impedance >660 Ω and threshold <1.0 V/0.24 ms may predict an increase in pacing threshold.