Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2013
Should food intake and circadian rhythm be considered when measuring serum calcitonin level?
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zayed Ayman A, Alzubaidi Mohammed, Atallah Sama, Momani Munther S, Al-Delaimy Wael K
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between both food intake and circadian rhythmicity and serum calcitonin in the same individuals.
METHODS: Eighteen healthy subjects, 10 males and 8 females, aged 22 to 24 years, were recruited. Serum calcitonin level was measured three times: at 0800 after a 9-hour overnight fast, at 0900 postprandially, and at 1700 after another 9-hour fast. The same protocol was repeated once.
RESULTS: The mean calcitonin levels (at 0800) were 3.92 pg/mL (SD, 2.5 pg/mL) on Day 1 and 3.52 pg/mL (SD, 2.1 pg/mL) on Day 2. Mean postprandial calcitonin (at 0900) was 9.46 pg/mL (SD, 8.6 pg/mL) on Day 1 and 9.91 pg/mL (SD, 6.9 pg/mL) on Day 2. Mean fasting calcitonin in the evening (at 1700) was 6.74 pg/mL (SD, 4.73 pg/mL) on Day 1 and 6.49 pg/mL (SD, 3.57 pg/mL) on Day 2. There was no significant difference in the mean calcitonin level on days 1 and 2 for any of the three time points examined. Statistically significant differences were found between postprandial and evening calcitonin levels and the fasting levels on Day 1 (P = .018 and .015, respectively) and Day 2 (P = .001 and .0009, respectively).
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that serum calcitonin level is significantly influenced by food intake in healthy young subjects and reveal a circadian rhythm, with increased calcitonin level during the afternoon. The timing of blood sampling relative to meals should be integrated into clinical practice and research settings involving serum calcitonin measurements.
METHODS: Eighteen healthy subjects, 10 males and 8 females, aged 22 to 24 years, were recruited. Serum calcitonin level was measured three times: at 0800 after a 9-hour overnight fast, at 0900 postprandially, and at 1700 after another 9-hour fast. The same protocol was repeated once.
RESULTS: The mean calcitonin levels (at 0800) were 3.92 pg/mL (SD, 2.5 pg/mL) on Day 1 and 3.52 pg/mL (SD, 2.1 pg/mL) on Day 2. Mean postprandial calcitonin (at 0900) was 9.46 pg/mL (SD, 8.6 pg/mL) on Day 1 and 9.91 pg/mL (SD, 6.9 pg/mL) on Day 2. Mean fasting calcitonin in the evening (at 1700) was 6.74 pg/mL (SD, 4.73 pg/mL) on Day 1 and 6.49 pg/mL (SD, 3.57 pg/mL) on Day 2. There was no significant difference in the mean calcitonin level on days 1 and 2 for any of the three time points examined. Statistically significant differences were found between postprandial and evening calcitonin levels and the fasting levels on Day 1 (P = .018 and .015, respectively) and Day 2 (P = .001 and .0009, respectively).
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that serum calcitonin level is significantly influenced by food intake in healthy young subjects and reveal a circadian rhythm, with increased calcitonin level during the afternoon. The timing of blood sampling relative to meals should be integrated into clinical practice and research settings involving serum calcitonin measurements.