MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/00016489.2021.1916588

Медицинская библиотека · Acta oto-laryngologica · 2021

The feasibility of vagal nerve stimulation revision surgery and surgical techniques: a retrospective review.

Al Omari Ahmad I, Nuseir Amjad, Kanaan Yazan, Al-Ashqar Ra'ed, Alzoubi Firas

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

With the large number of VNS implants performed worldwide, the need for removal or replacement of the device in selected cases is emerging, this removal or replacement of VNS can be challenging.

AIMS/

OBJECTIVE

To describe the feasibility and safety of revising vagal nerve stimulation surgery in terms of the indications, surgical techniques, and outcomes.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A retrospective study, a series of eight cases with VNS implants that needed revision surgery have been reviewed, four devices were completely removed and four were only revised. The revision surgery was performed after a range of 7 months to 6 years, due to different reasons. Initial surgeries and revisions were performed at the otolaryngology department in a major tertiary center.

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: We concluded that the previously implanted vagal nerve stimulation electrodes can be completely removed without any significant sequelae on the nerve. It may also be re-implanted safely at the previously used segment of the vagus nerve with a similar outcome in seizure control as the initial implantation.

Для цитирования: Al Omari Ahmad I, Nuseir Amjad, Kanaan Yazan, Al-Ashqar Ra'ed, Alzoubi Firas. The feasibility of vagal nerve stimulation revision surgery and surgical techniques: a retrospective review.. Acta oto-laryngologica. 2021. DOI: 10.1080/00016489.2021.1916588.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.