Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Ureterocalicostomy in the Setting of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction: A Multi-Institutional Cohort.

PURPOSE: Recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) after failed pyeloplasty is a complex surgical dilemma. The robot-assisted laparoscopic ureterocalicostomy (RALUC) is a potential surgical approach, but widespread adoption is limited due to the perceived technical challenge of the procedure. We present a multi-institutional pediatric cohort undergoing RALUC for recurrent or complex UPJO, and hypothesize that the procedure is reproducible, safe and efficacious.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A 3-center multi-institutional collaboration was initiated and medical records of children undergoing RALUC between 2012 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The details on baseline demographics, perioperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were aggregated.

RESULTS

During the study period 24 patients, 7 (29%) females and 17 (71%) males, were identified. Of the patients 21 (86%) had a history of previous pyeloplasty prior to RALUC, of whom 5 (24%) had 2 prior failed ipsilateral pyeloplasties. The reason for performing RALUC was short ureter in 3 (13%), intrarenal pelvis in 5 (21%) and extensive scarring at the ureteropelvic junction locus in 16 (67%) patients. The median age of patients at time of surgery was 5.1 years (IQR: 1.9, 14.7). Of the patients 9 (38%) had percutaneous nephrostomy prior to surgery; if percutaneous nephrostomy tubes were placed for relief of obstruction, an antegrade contrast study was done postoperatively to confirm resolution of obstruction. No 30-day Clavien-Dindo Grade III-V complications were noted. During the median followup of 16.1 months (IQR: 6, 47.5), 22 (92%) had improved symptoms and hydronephrosis with no further intervention; 2 (8%) patients underwent endoscopic interventions after RALUC and both ultimately underwent nephrectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

This multi-institutional cohort demonstrates that RALUC is a safe and efficacious salvage option for failed pyeloplasty or complex anatomy with an acceptable success profile, especially in cases of extensive scarring at the UPJO or an intrarenal pelvis.