Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2011
Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty during removal of impacted lower third molars.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Carvalho Ricardo Wathson F, do Egito Vasconcelos Belmiro Cavalcanti
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to adjust a multivariate model to explain each of the response variables for the occurrence of surgical difficulty during the removal of impacted lower third molars.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study was carried out involving patients submitted to at least one surgical removal of an impacted lower third molar. A total of 285 patients fulfilled the eligibility criteria and 473 surgeries were performed. Preoperative variables indicative of surgical difficulty were recorded. All surgical procedures were performed under the same conditions by two surgeons who were unaware of the data collected in the pre-selection phase. Either Pearson's chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used for the data analysis (P<5.0%).
RESULTS: Root number (P((1)) < 0.004*) and morphology (P((1)) < 0.031*), tooth position (P((1)) = 0.001*), periodontal space (P((2)) < 0.004*) and second molar relation (P((1)) = 0.001*) were significant predictors of surgical difficulty, whereas patient age (P((1)) = 0.097), gender (P((1)) = 0.470), body mass index (P((1)) = 0.719), associated pathologies (P((1)) = 0.237), relation with mandibular canal (P((1)) = 0.384) and width of 3rd molar crown (P((1)) = 0.154) were not significant predictors.
CONCLUSION: Many factors contribute to surgical difficulty, but considering these factors individually, some are only determinants of either difficulty or complications. Thus, not all significant predictors of surgical difficulty should be considered indicators of complications.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study was carried out involving patients submitted to at least one surgical removal of an impacted lower third molar. A total of 285 patients fulfilled the eligibility criteria and 473 surgeries were performed. Preoperative variables indicative of surgical difficulty were recorded. All surgical procedures were performed under the same conditions by two surgeons who were unaware of the data collected in the pre-selection phase. Either Pearson's chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used for the data analysis (P<5.0%).
RESULTS: Root number (P((1)) < 0.004*) and morphology (P((1)) < 0.031*), tooth position (P((1)) = 0.001*), periodontal space (P((2)) < 0.004*) and second molar relation (P((1)) = 0.001*) were significant predictors of surgical difficulty, whereas patient age (P((1)) = 0.097), gender (P((1)) = 0.470), body mass index (P((1)) = 0.719), associated pathologies (P((1)) = 0.237), relation with mandibular canal (P((1)) = 0.384) and width of 3rd molar crown (P((1)) = 0.154) were not significant predictors.
CONCLUSION: Many factors contribute to surgical difficulty, but considering these factors individually, some are only determinants of either difficulty or complications. Thus, not all significant predictors of surgical difficulty should be considered indicators of complications.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAge FactorsBody Mass IndexBone ResorptionCohort StudiesDental CariesFemaleForecastingHumansMaleMandibleMolarMolar, ThirdOsteotomyPericoronitisPeriodontiumProspective StudiesRadiography, PanoramicRisk FactorsSex FactorsTime FactorsTooth ApexTooth CrownTooth ExtractionTooth RootTooth, ImpactedTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult