Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2018
Intra-operative cortical motor mapping using subdural grid electrodes in children undergoing epilepsy surgery evaluation and comparison with the conventional extra-operative motor mapping.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jain Puneet, Whitney Robyn, Strantzas Samuel, McCoy Blathnaid, Ochi Ayako, Otsubo Hiroshi, Snead O Carter, Weiss Shelly, Donner Elizabeth, Pang Elizabeth, Sharma Rohit, Viljoen Amrita, Keller Anne, Drake James M, Rutka James T, Go Cristina
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to review our experience with intra-operative "train of five" stimulation using subdural grid for motor mapping in children undergoing epilepsy surgery evaluation.
METHODS: Twenty consecutive children below 18-years of age with drug-refractory epilepsy who underwent invasive-EEG monitoring using subdural-grid placement and intra-operative motor mapping using direct cortical stimulation by sub-dural grid electrodes (IODCS-SDG) at our institution between January-2016 and June-2017 were reviewed. Stimulation was delivered through the subdural-grid electrodes using a train-of-five pulses and muscle responses were recorded by motor-evoked-potentials (MEPs). Intra-operative direct cortical stimulation delivered through a ball-tipped probe (IODCS-probe) and extra-operative motor-mapping (EODCS-SDG) were also performed.
RESULTS: IODCS-SDG was completed in 20 patients and subsequent EODCS-SDG was done in 17/20 patients. MEP responses were more commonly obtained in the deltoid (19/20), extensor-digitorum-communis (20/20) and first-dorsal-interosseus (19/20). The median thresholds varied between 40 V and 60 V for the six muscle groups. The respective IODCS-probe thresholds tended to be similar. No stimulation-provoked seizures or anaesthesia-related complications were noted during IODCS-SDG. EODCS-SDG could not be completed in 4/17 children and mapping data obtained was frequently inadequate. Nine patients demonstrated 100% concordance between IODCS-SDG and EODCS-SDG for the common mapped body regions. Stimulation-provoked seizures during EODCS-SDG were seen in 6/17 (35.3%) and after-discharges in 7/17 (41.2%) children.
CONCLUSIONS: IODCS-SDG could be performed safely in children with drug refractory epilepsy undergoing invasive EEG monitoring.
SIGNIFICANCE: IODCS-SDG may be a useful adjunct to EODCS-SDG in motor mapping for children.
METHODS: Twenty consecutive children below 18-years of age with drug-refractory epilepsy who underwent invasive-EEG monitoring using subdural-grid placement and intra-operative motor mapping using direct cortical stimulation by sub-dural grid electrodes (IODCS-SDG) at our institution between January-2016 and June-2017 were reviewed. Stimulation was delivered through the subdural-grid electrodes using a train-of-five pulses and muscle responses were recorded by motor-evoked-potentials (MEPs). Intra-operative direct cortical stimulation delivered through a ball-tipped probe (IODCS-probe) and extra-operative motor-mapping (EODCS-SDG) were also performed.
RESULTS: IODCS-SDG was completed in 20 patients and subsequent EODCS-SDG was done in 17/20 patients. MEP responses were more commonly obtained in the deltoid (19/20), extensor-digitorum-communis (20/20) and first-dorsal-interosseus (19/20). The median thresholds varied between 40 V and 60 V for the six muscle groups. The respective IODCS-probe thresholds tended to be similar. No stimulation-provoked seizures or anaesthesia-related complications were noted during IODCS-SDG. EODCS-SDG could not be completed in 4/17 children and mapping data obtained was frequently inadequate. Nine patients demonstrated 100% concordance between IODCS-SDG and EODCS-SDG for the common mapped body regions. Stimulation-provoked seizures during EODCS-SDG were seen in 6/17 (35.3%) and after-discharges in 7/17 (41.2%) children.
CONCLUSIONS: IODCS-SDG could be performed safely in children with drug refractory epilepsy undergoing invasive EEG monitoring.
SIGNIFICANCE: IODCS-SDG may be a useful adjunct to EODCS-SDG in motor mapping for children.