Journal of cancer research and therapeutics · 2023
Induction chemotherapy in head and neck cancer - Boon or bane?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mall Aprajita, Negi Preety, Philip Ashwin Oommen, Kingsley Pamela A
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Although concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard of care for inoperable locally advanced head and neck cancer, induction chemotherapy is considered an alternative approach by head and neck oncologists worldwide.
AIMS: To evaluate the response to induction chemotherapy in terms of loco-regional control and treatment-related toxicity in inoperable locally advanced head and neck cancer patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was conducted on patients who received two to three cycles of induction chemotherapy. Following this, response assessment was performed clinically. Grading of radiation-induced oral mucositis and any interruptions in treatment were noted. At 8 weeks following treatment, magnetic resonance imaging-based radiological response assessment was performed using RECIST criteria version 1.1.
RESULTS: Our data revealed 57.7% complete response rate with induction chemotherapy, followed by chemoradiation therapy. We observed that post induction, 67.5% and 47.5% patients had reduction in T-stage (<0.001) and N-stage of disease (<0.001), respectively, with complete response more achieved in younger patients (≤50 years). Chemotherapy-induced bone marrow suppression and febrile neutropenia occurred in 7.5% patients. We demonstrated that a higher grade of radiation-induced mucositis was noticed among those receiving three cycles of induction chemotherapy (ICT) and aged >50 years.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that induction chemotherapy could still be a viable option for down-staging unresectable locally advanced disease, especially for younger patients in terms of better treatment response and tolerability. The number of cycles of ICT seems to influence radiation-induced mucositis. This study underscores the need for further studies to determine the exact role of ICT in locally advanced head and neck cancer.
AIMS: To evaluate the response to induction chemotherapy in terms of loco-regional control and treatment-related toxicity in inoperable locally advanced head and neck cancer patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was conducted on patients who received two to three cycles of induction chemotherapy. Following this, response assessment was performed clinically. Grading of radiation-induced oral mucositis and any interruptions in treatment were noted. At 8 weeks following treatment, magnetic resonance imaging-based radiological response assessment was performed using RECIST criteria version 1.1.
RESULTS: Our data revealed 57.7% complete response rate with induction chemotherapy, followed by chemoradiation therapy. We observed that post induction, 67.5% and 47.5% patients had reduction in T-stage (<0.001) and N-stage of disease (<0.001), respectively, with complete response more achieved in younger patients (≤50 years). Chemotherapy-induced bone marrow suppression and febrile neutropenia occurred in 7.5% patients. We demonstrated that a higher grade of radiation-induced mucositis was noticed among those receiving three cycles of induction chemotherapy (ICT) and aged >50 years.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that induction chemotherapy could still be a viable option for down-staging unresectable locally advanced disease, especially for younger patients in terms of better treatment response and tolerability. The number of cycles of ICT seems to influence radiation-induced mucositis. This study underscores the need for further studies to determine the exact role of ICT in locally advanced head and neck cancer.