MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.103953

Медицинская библиотека · Critical reviews in oncology/hematology · 2023

Efficacy and safety of adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ma Xiao, Fang Jin, Zhang Lu, Huang Yao, Shen Hui, Ma Xiaohua, Zhang Shuixing, Zhang Bin

МетаанализСистематический обзорСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) is generally treated using concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT); yet, the effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) following CCRT remains controversial.

METHODS

The databases Embase, Web of Science, and PubMed were analyzed for relevant research. Primary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Fifteen trials with 4041 patients were included. Pooled HRs for PFS and OS were 0.81 (95 % CI: 0.67-0.96) and 0.69 (95 % CI: 0.51-0.93), respectively. However, subgroup analyses indicated that in randomized trials and trials with larger sample sizes (n > 100) as well as ACT cycles ≤ 3, ACT was not linked with improved PFS and OS. Moreover, ACT induced a greater rate of hematologic toxicities (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Higher quality of evidence suggests that ACT could not yield additional survival benefits for LACC; however, identifying high-risk patients who may benefit from ACT is required to design further clinical trials and better inform treatment decisions.

Для цитирования: Ma Xiao, Fang Jin, Zhang Lu, Huang Yao, Shen Hui, Ma Xiaohua, Zhang Shuixing, Zhang Bin. Efficacy and safety of adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.. Critical reviews in oncology/hematology. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.103953.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.