MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/jme.28.2.105

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of medical ethics · 2002

The ethics of surgery in the elderly demented patient with bowel obstruction.

Gallagher P, Clark K

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Little has been written in the medical literature concerning the ethics of treatment of the elderly demented patient with bowel obstruction. It is one example of the issues with which we are becoming increasingly involved. We conducted a survey of our colleagues' opinions to determine current practice.

DESIGN

A postal questionnaire study (62% response rate). Questions were posed that related to a case scenario of an elderly demented patient presenting with a presumed sigmoid volvulus.

SETTING

The northern region of England.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty seven surgical members of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, Northern Chapter.

RESULTS

Sixty five per cent of respondents felt that surgery would be inappropriate, and 26% that any intervention at all upon the subject in the case scenario would be inappropriate. More would operate, however, at the request of relatives. An advance directive not to treat would be respected by 70% despite a relative's wishes.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall there was a wide variation in the approach of the surgeons to a demented patient with bowel obstruction. In an era of clinical governance, and an increased awareness of the ethics of consent, this study presents one example of the difficult decisions with which we are increasingly faced. The greater use of advance directives may provide one possible solution.

Для цитирования: Gallagher P, Clark K. The ethics of surgery in the elderly demented patient with bowel obstruction.. Journal of medical ethics. 2002. DOI: 10.1136/jme.28.2.105.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.