Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery · 2015
Mandibular lingual release versus mandibular lip-split approach for expanded resection of middle-late tongue cancer: A case-control study.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li Hua, Li Jinzhong, Yang Bin, Su Ming, Xing Rudong, Han Zhengxue
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The mandibular lingual release (MLR) and mandibular lip-split (MS) approaches are the two common access approaches for resection of malignant tongue tumors. This case-control study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of these two approaches for the expanded resection of middle-late tongue cancer.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 56 matched patients with resectable middle-late squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue body were consecutively hospitalized for expanded resection using the MLR (n = 26) or MS approach (n = 30) between March 2004 and November 2012. Main outcome measures consisted of tumor exposure, surgical morbidity, maxillofacial motor-sensory return, and head/neck-specific quality of life.
RESULTS: The two approaches achieved similar en bloc R0 resection with similar tumor exposure. The MLR approach was associated with a significantly lower frequency of maxillofacial pain (P < 0.05) and no incidence of mandible nonunion. The MLR approach was also associated with a significantly better quality of life with respect to local pain, facial appearance, and mood.
CONCLUSION: Compared to the MS approach, the MLR approach was associated with significantly less surgical morbidity and a significantly better quality of life for middle-late tongue cancer patients undergoing expanded resection.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 56 matched patients with resectable middle-late squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue body were consecutively hospitalized for expanded resection using the MLR (n = 26) or MS approach (n = 30) between March 2004 and November 2012. Main outcome measures consisted of tumor exposure, surgical morbidity, maxillofacial motor-sensory return, and head/neck-specific quality of life.
RESULTS: The two approaches achieved similar en bloc R0 resection with similar tumor exposure. The MLR approach was associated with a significantly lower frequency of maxillofacial pain (P < 0.05) and no incidence of mandible nonunion. The MLR approach was also associated with a significantly better quality of life with respect to local pain, facial appearance, and mood.
CONCLUSION: Compared to the MS approach, the MLR approach was associated with significantly less surgical morbidity and a significantly better quality of life for middle-late tongue cancer patients undergoing expanded resection.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAdultAgedCarcinoma, Squamous CellCase-Control StudiesDeglutitionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLipMaleMandibleMasticationMiddle AgedNeckNeck DissectionNeck MusclesPostoperative ComplicationsQuality of LifePlastic Surgery ProceduresSafetySensationSpeechTongue NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult