MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/0003489414534013

Медицинская библиотека · The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology · 2014

Consensus statement on round window vibroplasty.

Beltrame Achille M, Todt Ingo, Sprinzl Georg, Profant Milan, Schwab Burkhard

СтатьяОбзорConsensus StatementПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to review current knowledge regarding implantation of the Vibrant Soundbridge floating mass transducer (FMT) at the round window (round window vibroplasty) as well as to form a consensus on steps for a reliable, stable surgical procedure.

DATA SOURCES: Review of the literature and experimental observations by the authors.

CONCLUSION

Round window (RW) vibroplasty has been established as a reliable procedure that produces good and stable results for patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss. The experience gained over the past few years of the authors' more than 200 implantations has led to consensus on several key points: (1) a wide and bloodless access to the middle ear with facial nerve monitoring, (2) the careful and correct identification and exposure of the round window membrane, (3) a good setup for efficient energy transition of the FMT, namely, perpendicular placement of the FMT with no contact to bone and the placement of cartilage behind the FMT to create a preloaded "spring" function, and (4) 4 points of FMT fixation: a rim of the round window bony overhang left intact both anterior and posterior to the FMT, conductor link stabilization, and cartilage behind the FMT. In addition, the FMT should be covered with soft tissue.

Для цитирования: Beltrame Achille M, Todt Ingo, Sprinzl Georg, Profant Milan, Schwab Burkhard. Consensus statement on round window vibroplasty.. The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology. 2014. DOI: 10.1177/0003489414534013.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.