International dental journal · 2016
Temporomandibular disorders and oral parafunction in children living with their parents and children living in institutional protective care: a comparative study.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Şermet Elbay Ülkü, Demirturk Kocasarac Husniye, Elbay Mesut, Kaya Can, Uğurluel Ceren, Baydemir Canan
Аннотация
AIM: This study aimed: (i) to identify and compare the prevalence of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) and oral parafunctions among children living in child-protection institutions (CLCPI) with children living with their parents (CLWP); (ii) to determine whether or not there is an association between oral parafunctions and TMDs; and (iii) to examine the possible impact of stress on TMDs.
STUDY DESIGN: The study was conducted on a total of 385 children who were divided into two groups: the CLCPI group (n = 184); and the CLWP group (control, n = 201). All children 8-18 years of age and living in protective-care facilities in Kocaeli, Turkey, were included in this study in the CLCPI group. The CLWP control group comprised children of the same age as those in the CLCPI group, but those in the CLWP group were living with their families and were randomly selected from one primary school, one elementary school and one high school in Kocaeli, Turkey. Each child in the study completed a questionnaire and underwent a clinical examination.
RESULTS: The overall prevalence of TMDs and oral parafunctions were higher in the CLCPI group than in the CLWP group (P < 0.05). The vast majority of participants reported at least one parafunction (CLCPI, n = 97.3%; CLWP, n = 93%). Problems related to family or friends were higher in the CLCPI group, whereas problems related to school lessons were higher in the CLWP group (P < 0.05). In both groups, positive associations were found between signs and symptoms of TMDs, oral parafunctions and stressful life events.
CONCLUSION: The prevalence of signs and symptoms of TMDs and oral parafunctions differed significantly between CLCPI and CLWP groups, with children of the CLCPI group found to be significantly more prone to TMDs and oral parafunctions than children of the CLWP group.
STUDY DESIGN: The study was conducted on a total of 385 children who were divided into two groups: the CLCPI group (n = 184); and the CLWP group (control, n = 201). All children 8-18 years of age and living in protective-care facilities in Kocaeli, Turkey, were included in this study in the CLCPI group. The CLWP control group comprised children of the same age as those in the CLCPI group, but those in the CLWP group were living with their families and were randomly selected from one primary school, one elementary school and one high school in Kocaeli, Turkey. Each child in the study completed a questionnaire and underwent a clinical examination.
RESULTS: The overall prevalence of TMDs and oral parafunctions were higher in the CLCPI group than in the CLWP group (P < 0.05). The vast majority of participants reported at least one parafunction (CLCPI, n = 97.3%; CLWP, n = 93%). Problems related to family or friends were higher in the CLCPI group, whereas problems related to school lessons were higher in the CLWP group (P < 0.05). In both groups, positive associations were found between signs and symptoms of TMDs, oral parafunctions and stressful life events.
CONCLUSION: The prevalence of signs and symptoms of TMDs and oral parafunctions differed significantly between CLCPI and CLWP groups, with children of the CLCPI group found to be significantly more prone to TMDs and oral parafunctions than children of the CLWP group.