Results of bypass graft surgery after prior angioplasty in critical limb ischaemia treatment.

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine the outcomes of primary bypass graft surgery (BGS) compared to BGS after failed angioplasty (PTA).

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

Between January 2007 and January 2014, we performed 136 BGSs exclusively for the treatment of critical limb ischaemia. Two cohorts were identified: 1) primary BGS (n = 102; group I), and 2) BGS after prior PTA (n = 34; group II). Data were analysed retrospectively and the primary endpoints were the rates of secondary patency, amputation-free survival, freedom from major adverse outcomes (graft occlusion, amputation, or death), and overall survival, which were assessed with the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Both groups were comparable with a predominance of Rutherford's category 5 ischaemic lesions (73.3 %). Most patients had extensive TASC D athe-rosclerotic disease (83.6 %), and the main conduit was the greater saphenous vein (58.1 %). The mean follow-up time was 36.2 months. The 3-year secondary patency rates were better for group I (64.3 % vs 49.6 %; P = 0.04). During the same period, the amputation-free survival rates were similar between the groups (77.4 % vs 74.5 %; P = 0.59). For multivariate Cox regression analysis, BGS after prior PTA was the only factor associated with re-intervention for limb salvage (hazard ratio = 2.39; CI 95 % = 1.19 - 4.80; P = 0.02). At the 3-year point, there were no differences in the overall survival rates (72.6 % vs 70 %; P = 0.97), but the proportion of patients without adverse outcomes was higher in group I (37.3 % vs 13.4 %; P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Although secondary patency was better after primary BGS, the amputation-free and overall survival rates support the use of BGS after prior PTA.