MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-9-122

Медицинская библиотека · BMC public health · 2009

Pilot evaluation of a walking school bus program in a low-income, urban community.

Mendoza Jason A, Levinger David D, Johnston Brian D

Контролируемое клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the impact of a walking school bus (WSB) program on student transport in a low-income, urban neighborhood.

METHODS

The design was a controlled, quasi-experimental trial with consecutive cross-sectional assessments. The setting was three urban, socioeconomically disadvantaged, public elementary schools (1 intervention vs. 2 controls) in Seattle, Washington, USA. Participants were ethnically diverse students in kindergarten-5th grade (aged 5-11 years). The intervention was a WSB program consisting of a part-time WSB coordinator and parent volunteers. Students' method of transportation to school was assessed by a classroom survey at baseline and one-year follow-up. The Pearson Chi-squared test compared students transported to school at the intervention versus control schools at each time point. Due to multiple testing, we calculated adjusted p-values using the Ryan-Holm stepdown Bonferroni procedure. McNemar's test was used to examine the change from baseline to 12-month follow-up for walking versus all other forms of school transport at the intervention or control schools.

RESULTS

At baseline, the proportions of students (n = 653) walking to the intervention (20% +/- 2%) or control schools (15% +/- 2%) did not differ (p = 0.39). At 12-month follow up, higher proportions of students (n = 643, p = 0.001)) walked to the intervention (25% +/- 2%) versus the control schools (7% +/- 1%). No significant changes were noted in the proportion of students riding in a car or taking the school bus at baseline or 12-month follow up (all p > 0.05). Comparing baseline to 12-month follow up, the numbers of students who walked to the intervention school increased while the numbers of students who used the other forms of transport did not change (p < 0.0001). In contrast, the numbers of students who walked to the control schools decreased while the numbers of students who used the other forms of transport did not change (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

A WSB program is a promising intervention among urban, low-income elementary school students that may promote favorable changes toward active transport to school.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00402701.

Для цитирования: Mendoza Jason A, Levinger David D, Johnston Brian D. Pilot evaluation of a walking school bus program in a low-income, urban community.. BMC public health. 2009. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-122.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.