DOI 10.4274/jcrpe.galenos.2025.2025-1-7
Improving Diabetes Care Through Teamwork, Comprehensive Education, Tighter Goals, and Technology: Single-Center Data from Türkiye.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
The management of type 1 diabetes (T1D) in children aims to achieve an hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of <7%, a good quality of life and a life similar to that of their peers. While the HbA1c <7% target may be difficult to achieve, it is possible that national programs, quality control programs and setting team targets can achieve significant reductions in HbA1c.
METHODS
The records of children with T1D followed up in our department between 2020 and 2022 were analyzed. Children and their families received a comprehensive education including an “Individual Treatment Plan”, nutrition and carbohydrate counting. All HbA1c measured during follow-up were averaged for each child separately. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data from the last visit was evaluated in terms of achieving CGM consensus targets. To assess the effect of CGM use and automated insulin delivery (AID) system use, subjects were divided into 3 groups as multiple dose insulin and CGM users, non-AID pump users and AID users and evaluated.
RESULTS
The 480 children included in the study had a mean HbA1c of 7.8±1.5% at the first visit. The median HbA1c value during the two-year follow-up was 7.1%. Of the participants, 43% had an HbA1c <7%. Evaluating cases by treatment modalities and glucose measurement methods revealed that AID users having the lowest mean HbA1c (7±0.7%).
CONCLUSION
While diabetes technologies have significantly improved T1D treatment, we believe that holistic approaches focusing on patient behaviors, comprehensive education, teamwork, written individualized treatment plans, and tighter metabolic goals are effective in achieving better glycemic outcomes.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.