MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Nippon Ganka Gakkai zasshi · 2015

[Clinical Survey of Uveitis in Tokyo Medical and Dental University--Comparison between the Periods of 1998-2001 and 2007-2011].

Miyanaga Masaru, Takase Hiroshi, Kawaguchi Tatsushi, Kamoi Koju, Shimizu Kentaro, Yokota Mako, Sugita Sunao, Mochizuki Manabu

Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To investigate a clinical survey of uveitis in Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital.

SUBJECTS AND

METHODS

The clinical records of patients with uveitis who were treated from October 1998 to December 2001 and from January 2007 to December 2011 were reviewed. The clinical results of both periods were compared.

RESULTS

A total number of 455 patients (707 eyes) and 1091 patients (1716 eyes) were analyzed in this survey. The mean age of the first period was 45.4, and of the second 50.3 years old. The incidences of sarcoidosis (11.0%, 13.7%) and Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease (5.7%, 5.9%) were virtually unchanged in the two series. However, the incidence of Behçet's disease was higher in the first period (10.6%) than in the second (5.8%). The frequency of herpetic iritis (1.8%, 4.7%) and intraocular lymphoma (0.4%, 2.6%)showed apparent increase. Unclassified uveitis decreased from 55.6% to 47.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

The etiologies of uveitis have changed with the progress of diagnostic techniques and the establishment of new disease concepts.

Для цитирования: Miyanaga Masaru, Takase Hiroshi, Kawaguchi Tatsushi, Kamoi Koju, Shimizu Kentaro, Yokota Mako, Sugita Sunao, Mochizuki Manabu. [Clinical Survey of Uveitis in Tokyo Medical and Dental University--Comparison between the Periods of 1998-2001 and 2007-2011].. Nippon Ganka Gakkai zasshi. 2015.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.