MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/neuonc/noab245

Медицинская библиотека · Neuro-oncology · 2022

Accuracy of central neuro-imaging review of DIPG compared with histopathology in the International DIPG Registry.

Lazow Margot A, Fuller Christine, DeWire Mariko, Lane Adam, Bandopadhayay Pratiti, Bartels Ute, Bouffet Eric, Cheng Sylvia, Cohen Kenneth J, Cooney Tabitha M, Coven Scott L, Dholaria Hetal, Diez Blanca, Dorris Kathleen, El-Ayadi Moatasem, El-Sheikh Ayman, Fisher Paul G, Fonseca Adriana, Garcia Lombardi Mercedes, Greiner Robert J, Goldman Stewart, Gottardo Nicholas, Gururangan Sridharan, Hansford Jordan R, Hassall Tim, Hawkins Cynthia, Kilburn Lindsay, Koschmann Carl, Leary Sarah E, Ma Jie, Minturn Jane E, Monje-Deisseroth Michelle, Packer Roger, Samson Yvan, Sandler Eric S, Sevlever Gustavo, Tinkle Christopher L, Tsui Karen, Wagner Lars M, Zaghloul Mohamed, Ziegler David S, Chaney Brooklyn, Black Katie, Asher Anthony, Drissi Rachid, Fouladi Maryam, Jones Blaise V, Leach James L

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) remains a clinico-radiologic diagnosis without routine tissue acquisition. Reliable imaging distinction between DIPG and other pontine tumors with potentially more favorable prognoses and treatment considerations is essential.

METHODS

Cases submitted to the International DIPG registry (IDIPGR) with histopathologic and/or radiologic data were analyzed. Central imaging review was performed on diagnostic brain MRIs (if available) by two neuro-radiologists. Imaging features suggestive of alternative diagnoses included nonpontine origin, <50% pontine involvement, focally exophytic morphology, sharply defined margins, and/or marked diffusion restriction throughout.

RESULTS

Among 286 patients with pathology from biopsy and/or autopsy, 23 (8%) had histologic diagnoses inconsistent with DIPG, most commonly nondiffuse low-grade gliomas and embryonal tumors. Among 569 patients with centrally-reviewed diagnostic MRIs, 40 (7%) were classified as non-DIPG, alternative diagnosis suspected. The combined analysis included 151 patients with both histopathology and centrally-reviewed MRI. Of 77 patients with imaging classified as characteristic of DIPG, 76 (99%) had histopathologic diagnoses consistent with DIPG (infiltrating grade II-IV gliomas). Of 57 patients classified as likely DIPG with some unusual imaging features, 55 (96%) had histopathologic diagnoses consistent with DIPG. Of 17 patients with imaging features suggestive of an alternative diagnosis, eight (47%) had histopathologic diagnoses inconsistent with DIPG (remaining patients were excluded due to nonpontine tumor origin). Association between central neuro-imaging review impression and histopathology was significant (p < 0.001), and central neuro-imaging impression was prognostic of overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy and important role of central neuro-imaging review in confirming the diagnosis of DIPG is demonstrated.

Для цитирования: Lazow Margot A, Fuller Christine, DeWire Mariko, Lane Adam, Bandopadhayay Pratiti, Bartels Ute, Bouffet Eric, Cheng Sylvia, Cohen Kenneth J, Cooney Tabitha M, Coven Scott L, Dholaria Hetal, Diez Blanca, Dorris Kathleen, El-Ayadi Moatasem, El-Sheikh Ayman, Fisher Paul G, Fonseca Adriana, Garcia Lombardi Mercedes, Greiner Robert J, Goldman Stewart, Gottardo Nicholas, Gururangan Sridharan, Hansford Jordan R, Hassall Tim, Hawkins Cynthia, Kilburn Lindsay, Koschmann Carl, Leary Sarah E, Ma Jie, Minturn Jane E, Monje-Deisseroth Michelle, Packer Roger, Samson Yvan, Sandler Eric S, Sevlever Gustavo, Tinkle Christopher L, Tsui Karen, Wagner Lars M, Zaghloul Mohamed, Ziegler David S, Chaney Brooklyn, Black Katie, Asher Anthony, Drissi Rachid, Fouladi Maryam, Jones Blaise V, Leach James L. Accuracy of central neuro-imaging review of DIPG compared with histopathology in the International DIPG Registry.. Neuro-oncology. 2022. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab245.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.