DOI 10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112226
MRI for assessing abdominal organs iron concentration: A comparative study between the relaxometry methods.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) commercial 3D quantitative Dixon sequence (qDixon) and 2D multi-gradient recalled echo sequence (GRE) for iron quantification in multiple abdominal organs.
METHODS
1.5T MRI GRE and qDixon data were collected on patients with 211 MR exams from 171 patients (86 males, 85 females; median age: 21 years). Compare the R2* values of liver, pancreas, spleen, and kidneys using Bland-Altman, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), concordance correlation coefficients (CCC), and linear regression. Iron overload (IO) diagnostic concordance was assessed using overall agreement and the Kappa coefficient.
RESULTS
Bland-Altman analysis of liver, pancreas, spleen, and kidney R2* values between GRE and qDixon, resulted in a bias (absolute mean difference) of -11.3 1/s (LoA: 77.7 and -100.3), -11.2 1/s (LoA: 123.9 and -146.3), 5.1 1/s (LoA: 117.3 and -107.1), and 1.9 1/s (LoA: 14.7 and -10.9). The CCCs between GRE and qDixon R2* values for liver, pancreas, spleen, and kidneys were 0.98, 0.94, 0.96, and 0.95, the ICCs were 0.99, 0.95, 0.96, and 0.97, respectively. Linear regression analysis correlating abdominal organs R2* values of GRE and qDixon resulted in a coefficient of determination of 0.96, 0.89, 0.93, and 0.92 (all P < 0.001). The overall agreement was 98.5 %, 94.8 %, 92.6 %, and 90.7 %; the Kappa value was 0.95, 0.89, 0.84, and 0.69 (all P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
The qDixon and GRE showed good agreement and significant positive in measuring R2* values for IO assessment in abdominal organs, with qDixon being an excellent adjunctive diagnostic method.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.