Annals of surgery · 2025
Preoperative Exercise to Improve Fitness in Patients Undergoing Complex Surgery for Cancer of the Lung or Esophagus (PRE-HIIT): A Randomized Controlled Trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Smyth Emily, O'Neill Linda M, Kearney Neil, Sheill Grainne, Brennan Louise, Wade Sarah, Grehan Sophie, Begic Sanela, Egaña Mikel, Ryan Ronan, Fitzmaurice Gerard J, Murphy Ross T, McKittrick Myles, Doyle Suzanne L, Walsh Cathal, Ravi Narayanasamy, Donohoe Claire L, Reynolds John V, Hussey Juliette, Guinan Emer M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This randomized controlled trial (RCT) compared the impact of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) versus standard care (SC) on preoperative cardiopulmonary fitness in patients before esophageal or lung cancer surgery.
BACKGROUND: Exercise prehabilitation aims to optimise preoperative condition and attenuate postoperative risks. Although intuitive, defining the optimal training parameters to impact physiologically before surgery with attendant clinical benefit remains challenging.
METHODS: Utilising a parallel, 2-armed RCT design, n=79 participants [(mean age (SD): 64 (9.3) years, 67% males] scheduled for curative resection for lung (50.6%) or esophageal (49.6%) cancer with ≥2-weeks preoperative lead-in, were recruited and randomised to HIIT (n=41) or SC (n=38). HIIT was completed on an electronically braked cycle ergometer consisting of 30 minutes of 15-second intervals at 100% peak power output alternating with 15-second active recovery for 5 days/week. The SC arm was offered moderate-intensity exercises 2 to 3 days/week. The primary outcome was peak oxygen consumption (VO 2 peak), measured by cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Secondary outcomes included lower limb strength and physical functioning.
RESULTS: Baseline cardiopulmonary fitness was predominantly very poor [n=75 (95%)]. Adjusting for baseline in a linear model, VO 2 peak increased significantly ( P =0.05) in the HIIT group versus SC (6.6% between-group difference). HIIT increased VO 2 peak from 18.7 (5.0) to 21.7 (5.7) ml/kg/min, whereas with SC it remained unchanged at 19.6 (5.4) to 20.1 (5.7) ml/kg/min from pre-intervention to post-intervention. Sit-to-stand scores were significantly ( P =0.02) improved with HIIT.
CONCLUSIONS: HIIT is effective for eliciting meaningful gains in preoperative fitness in a deconditioned cohort within short timeframes.
BACKGROUND: Exercise prehabilitation aims to optimise preoperative condition and attenuate postoperative risks. Although intuitive, defining the optimal training parameters to impact physiologically before surgery with attendant clinical benefit remains challenging.
METHODS: Utilising a parallel, 2-armed RCT design, n=79 participants [(mean age (SD): 64 (9.3) years, 67% males] scheduled for curative resection for lung (50.6%) or esophageal (49.6%) cancer with ≥2-weeks preoperative lead-in, were recruited and randomised to HIIT (n=41) or SC (n=38). HIIT was completed on an electronically braked cycle ergometer consisting of 30 minutes of 15-second intervals at 100% peak power output alternating with 15-second active recovery for 5 days/week. The SC arm was offered moderate-intensity exercises 2 to 3 days/week. The primary outcome was peak oxygen consumption (VO 2 peak), measured by cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Secondary outcomes included lower limb strength and physical functioning.
RESULTS: Baseline cardiopulmonary fitness was predominantly very poor [n=75 (95%)]. Adjusting for baseline in a linear model, VO 2 peak increased significantly ( P =0.05) in the HIIT group versus SC (6.6% between-group difference). HIIT increased VO 2 peak from 18.7 (5.0) to 21.7 (5.7) ml/kg/min, whereas with SC it remained unchanged at 19.6 (5.4) to 20.1 (5.7) ml/kg/min from pre-intervention to post-intervention. Sit-to-stand scores were significantly ( P =0.02) improved with HIIT.
CONCLUSIONS: HIIT is effective for eliciting meaningful gains in preoperative fitness in a deconditioned cohort within short timeframes.