American journal of ophthalmology · 2023
Characteristics Related to Visual Acuity Loss After Successful Photodynamic Therapy for Eyes With Central Serous Chorioretinopathy.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Funatsu Ryoh, Terasaki Hiroto, Sonoda Shozo, Shiihara Hideki, Mihara Naohisa, Sakamoto Taiji
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study aimed to examine baseline characteristics for identifying factors associated with vision loss (VL) in patients with central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) who successfully responded to photodynamic therapy (PDT).
DESIGN: A retrospective, clinical case-control study.
METHODS: This study included 85 eyes with CSC, which underwent PDT, and resolved serous retinal detachment. These eyes were classified into 2 groups: the VL group (best-corrected visual acuity 6 months after PDT was worse than that at baseline) and the vision maintenance or improved group (the others). Baseline factors were analyzed to determine the characteristics of the VL group and assess the diagnostic potential of these factors.
RESULT: Seventeen eyes were included in the VL group. The mean values of the neurosensory retinal (NSR) thickness, the internal limiting membrane-external limiting membrane thickness (IET), and the external limiting membrane-photoreceptor outer segment thickness (EOT) in the VL group were significantly thinner than those in the vision maintenance or improved group (NSR thickness, 123.2 ± 39.7 µm vs 166.3 ± 49.6 µm, P < .001; IET, 63.1 ± 17.0 µm vs 88.0 ± 25.4 µm, P < .001; EOT, 60.1 ± 28.6 µm vs 78.3 ± 33.1, P = .041). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for predicting VL were 94.1%, 50.0%, 32.0%, and 97.1% for NSR thickness; 94.1%, 51.5%, 32.7%, and 97.2% for IET; and 94.1%, 30.9%, 25.4%, and 95.5% for EOT, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment sensory retinal layer thickness could predict VL after PDT for CSC and may be a helpful reference for PDT.
DESIGN: A retrospective, clinical case-control study.
METHODS: This study included 85 eyes with CSC, which underwent PDT, and resolved serous retinal detachment. These eyes were classified into 2 groups: the VL group (best-corrected visual acuity 6 months after PDT was worse than that at baseline) and the vision maintenance or improved group (the others). Baseline factors were analyzed to determine the characteristics of the VL group and assess the diagnostic potential of these factors.
RESULT: Seventeen eyes were included in the VL group. The mean values of the neurosensory retinal (NSR) thickness, the internal limiting membrane-external limiting membrane thickness (IET), and the external limiting membrane-photoreceptor outer segment thickness (EOT) in the VL group were significantly thinner than those in the vision maintenance or improved group (NSR thickness, 123.2 ± 39.7 µm vs 166.3 ± 49.6 µm, P < .001; IET, 63.1 ± 17.0 µm vs 88.0 ± 25.4 µm, P < .001; EOT, 60.1 ± 28.6 µm vs 78.3 ± 33.1, P = .041). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for predicting VL were 94.1%, 50.0%, 32.0%, and 97.1% for NSR thickness; 94.1%, 51.5%, 32.7%, and 97.2% for IET; and 94.1%, 30.9%, 25.4%, and 95.5% for EOT, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment sensory retinal layer thickness could predict VL after PDT for CSC and may be a helpful reference for PDT.