International journal of paediatric dentistry · 2024
Parental acceptability of silver diamine fluoride: The UK and US experiences.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Timms Laura, Choi Sooji, Marshman Zoe, Rodd Helen, Wilson Anne R, Tiwari Tamanna
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: International data suggest that parents may have reservations about the use of silver diamine fluoride (SDF).
AIM: The aims of this study were to: (1) examine the acceptance of parents/carers towards the use of SDF for the management of caries in children's primary teeth in secondary care dental settings in the UK and the United States and (2) determine which factors may affect the acceptance of the use of SDF.
DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional questionnaire of SDF acceptability, completed by parents of young children. It was validated and adapted to local populations. Data were analysed with descriptive and inferential statistics.
RESULTS: Of the 113 Sheffield parents, 73% reported that they would accept SDF treatment of children's posterior teeth, with 58% reporting this for anterior teeth. Parents having less concern about posterior aesthetics had a statistically significant effect on reported acceptance of SDF (p = .013). In the Colorado sample (n = 104), 72% reported that they would accept SDF on posterior teeth, and 58% reported that they would accept SDF on anterior teeth. Concerns about aesthetics had an effect on decreasing SDF acceptance overall (p = .0065) in anterior (p = .023) and posterior teeth (p = .108).
CONCLUSION: The majority of parents in the two study populations accepted the treatment using SDF. However, concern about aesthetics had an influence on acceptability.
AIM: The aims of this study were to: (1) examine the acceptance of parents/carers towards the use of SDF for the management of caries in children's primary teeth in secondary care dental settings in the UK and the United States and (2) determine which factors may affect the acceptance of the use of SDF.
DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional questionnaire of SDF acceptability, completed by parents of young children. It was validated and adapted to local populations. Data were analysed with descriptive and inferential statistics.
RESULTS: Of the 113 Sheffield parents, 73% reported that they would accept SDF treatment of children's posterior teeth, with 58% reporting this for anterior teeth. Parents having less concern about posterior aesthetics had a statistically significant effect on reported acceptance of SDF (p = .013). In the Colorado sample (n = 104), 72% reported that they would accept SDF on posterior teeth, and 58% reported that they would accept SDF on anterior teeth. Concerns about aesthetics had an effect on decreasing SDF acceptance overall (p = .0065) in anterior (p = .023) and posterior teeth (p = .108).
CONCLUSION: The majority of parents in the two study populations accepted the treatment using SDF. However, concern about aesthetics had an influence on acceptability.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
HumansSilver CompoundsFluorides, TopicalQuaternary Ammonium CompoundsParentsCross-Sectional StudiesCariostatic AgentsUnited StatesUnited KingdomFemaleDental CariesSurveys and QuestionnairesMaleChildPatient Acceptance of Health CareTooth, DeciduousChild, PreschoolEsthetics, DentalAdultAttitude to Health