Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics · 2009
Efficacy of EMD versus calcium hydroxide in direct pulp capping of primary molars: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Garrocho-Rangel Arturo, Flores Hector, Silva-Herzog Daniel, Hernandez-Sierra Francisco, Mandeville Peter, Pozos-Guillen Amaury J
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The aim was to compare the clinical and radiographic efficacy of enamel matrix derivative and self-hardening calcium hydroxide as direct pulp capping materials on decayed primary molars, with observation periods of 1, 6, and 12 months.
STUDY DESIGN: A clinical, randomized, controlled trial was performed, following the "split-mouth" design. A total of 90 primary molars were treated. Assignation of materials and operative initial side were selected in a randomized manner. Five outcome variables were considered: internal dentin resorption, pain, gingival sinus tract, root external resorption, and pathologic mobility. The appearance of any of these signs or symptoms was considered to be a failure of treatment.
RESULTS: Significant statistical or clinical differences were not found between the study groups. Two treatments were judged as failures, 1 per study group; both occurred during the first postoperative month.
CONCLUSIONS: The technique used for direct pulp capping on primary molars in this study is recommended on the basis of the obtained clinical and radiographic results.
STUDY DESIGN: A clinical, randomized, controlled trial was performed, following the "split-mouth" design. A total of 90 primary molars were treated. Assignation of materials and operative initial side were selected in a randomized manner. Five outcome variables were considered: internal dentin resorption, pain, gingival sinus tract, root external resorption, and pathologic mobility. The appearance of any of these signs or symptoms was considered to be a failure of treatment.
RESULTS: Significant statistical or clinical differences were not found between the study groups. Two treatments were judged as failures, 1 per study group; both occurred during the first postoperative month.
CONCLUSIONS: The technique used for direct pulp capping on primary molars in this study is recommended on the basis of the obtained clinical and radiographic results.