Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany : 1985) · 2008
Radiographic evaluation of the prevalence of root resorption in a Middle Eastern population.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tsesis Igor, Fuss Zvi, Rosenberg Ester, Taicher Shlomo
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate radiographically the prevalence of various types of root resorption in different tooth groups in a Middle Eastern population.
METHOD AND MATERIALS: Full-mouth radiographs of 712 patients (19,072 teeth) were evaluated for the presence of root resorption. Two observers evaluated each tooth from at least 2 radiographic projections on periapical films.
RESULTS: Teeth exhibiting root resorption were found in 205 radiographs (28.8%). The most common form of resorption was pulpal infection (71.2%), mainly in mandibular molars ( P< .01) and in patients 45 years and older ( P< .005). Orthodontic pressure resorption was detected in 14.6% of root resorption cases, mainly in maxillary incisors ( P< .01). Impacted tooth or tumor pressure resorption was observed in 10.2% of all cases of resorption, mainly in mandibular molars ( P< .01), and periodontal infection resorption was identified in 3.9% of all resorption cases in all tooth groups ( P > .05). Ankylotic resorption was not found in this survey.
CONCLUSION: The most common types of root resorption in the general population were pulpal infection-related root resorption, orthodontic pressure root resorption, and impacted tooth pressure resorption. It is probable that most are unrelated to traumatic injuries of the teeth.
METHOD AND MATERIALS: Full-mouth radiographs of 712 patients (19,072 teeth) were evaluated for the presence of root resorption. Two observers evaluated each tooth from at least 2 radiographic projections on periapical films.
RESULTS: Teeth exhibiting root resorption were found in 205 radiographs (28.8%). The most common form of resorption was pulpal infection (71.2%), mainly in mandibular molars ( P< .01) and in patients 45 years and older ( P< .005). Orthodontic pressure resorption was detected in 14.6% of root resorption cases, mainly in maxillary incisors ( P< .01). Impacted tooth or tumor pressure resorption was observed in 10.2% of all cases of resorption, mainly in mandibular molars ( P< .01), and periodontal infection resorption was identified in 3.9% of all resorption cases in all tooth groups ( P > .05). Ankylotic resorption was not found in this survey.
CONCLUSION: The most common types of root resorption in the general population were pulpal infection-related root resorption, orthodontic pressure root resorption, and impacted tooth pressure resorption. It is probable that most are unrelated to traumatic injuries of the teeth.