m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024

Influence of Nucleophosmin (NPM1) Genotypes on Outcome of Patients With AML: An AIEOP-BFM and COG-SWOG Intergroup Collaboration.

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Tregnago Claudia, Benetton Maddalena, Ries Rhonda E, Peplinski Jack H, Alonzo Todd A, Stirewalt Derek, Othus Megan, Duployez Nicolas, Sonneveld Edwin, Abrahamsson Jonas, Fogelstrand Linda, von Neuhoff Nils, Hasle Henrik, Reinhardt Dirk, Meshinchi Soheil, Locatelli Franco, Pigazzi Martina

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Several genomic subsets of NPM1 mutations with varying sequences (type A, B, D, etc) have been identified. Despite molecular heterogeneity, NPM1 mutations cumulatively portend a more favorable outcome, but biology and prognostic implications of different genomic subsets have not been extensively studied. In this multicentric study, we investigated the impact of NPM1 genotypes on patient's outcomes and interrogated the underlying biology of the different subtypes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of more than 4,000 patients enrolled in multiple pediatric cooperative (AIEOP, BFM, ELAM02, NOPHO, DCOG, and COG trials), or adult (SWOG) trials, 348 pediatric and 75 adult AML patients with known NPM1 genotype and available outcome were selected for this study. Diverse NPM1 variants were correlated with the probabilities of overall survival (OS) and event-free survival. Nuclear localization and translational efficiency of the NPM1 variants was studied.

RESULTS: Evaluation of clinical outcome on the basis of NPM1 genotypes showed that patients with type A, B, and other rare variants had similarly favorable outcomes, whereas those with type D had a significantly worse outcome (OS of 63% for type D v 86% for type non-D, P = .005). Multivariate analysis confirmed type D as an independent prognostic factor associated with inferior OS (hazard ratio, 3; P = .005). In vitro, we demonstrated that in type D versus type A synonymous variants, codon optimality plays major roles in determining gene expression levels, and translation efficiency, which resulted in a more expressed NPM1-D mRNA and protein, mediating peculiar mitochondrial gene expression.

CONCLUSION: The evaluation of specific NPM1 genotypes identified AML patients with type D mutations being significantly associated with inferior outcomes, suggesting a reclassification of D cases to higher-risk groups.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты