Clinical transplantation · 2024
Novel Scoring System for Ranking Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Baxter-Lowe Lee Ann, Wang Tao, Kuxhausen Michelle, Spellman Stephen R, Maiers Martin, Lee Stephanie, Saultz Jennifer, Arrieta-Bolaños Esteban, Gadalla Shahinaz M, Bolon Yung-Tsi, Betts Brian C
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: When human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched donors are not available for hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT), there are no well-accepted guidelines for ranking 7/8 HLA-matched unrelated donors to achieve optimal transplant outcomes. A novel scoring system for ranking HLA mismatches for these donors was investigated.
METHODS: High-resolution HLA types were used to determine amino acid mismatches located in the HLA antigen-recognition domain. The location and physicochemical properties of mismatched amino acids were used to assign scores for peptide binding, T-cell receptor docking, and HLA structure/function. The scores were tested using a cohort of 2319 patients with leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome who received their first unrelated donor transplant using conventional graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis between 2000 and 2014. Donors were 7/8 HLA-matched with a single HLA Class I mismatch. Primary outcomes were overall survival and acute GVHD.
RESULTS: The scores did not significantly (p < 0.01) associate with transplant outcomes, although a Peptide Score = 0 (i.e., no differences in peptide binding; N = 146, 6.3%) appears to have lower transplant-related mortality (TRM) compared to higher scores (p = 0.019). HLA mismatches with Peptide Score = 0 were predominately HLA-C*03:03/03:04 (62%), previously reported to be a permissive mismatch, and a group of 28 other HLA mismatches (38%) that showed similar associations with TRM.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that HLA mismatches that do not alter peptide binding or orientation (Peptide Score = 0) could expand the number of permissive HLA mismatches. Further investigation is needed to confirm this observation and to explore alternative scoring systems for ranking HLA mismatched donors.
METHODS: High-resolution HLA types were used to determine amino acid mismatches located in the HLA antigen-recognition domain. The location and physicochemical properties of mismatched amino acids were used to assign scores for peptide binding, T-cell receptor docking, and HLA structure/function. The scores were tested using a cohort of 2319 patients with leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome who received their first unrelated donor transplant using conventional graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis between 2000 and 2014. Donors were 7/8 HLA-matched with a single HLA Class I mismatch. Primary outcomes were overall survival and acute GVHD.
RESULTS: The scores did not significantly (p < 0.01) associate with transplant outcomes, although a Peptide Score = 0 (i.e., no differences in peptide binding; N = 146, 6.3%) appears to have lower transplant-related mortality (TRM) compared to higher scores (p = 0.019). HLA mismatches with Peptide Score = 0 were predominately HLA-C*03:03/03:04 (62%), previously reported to be a permissive mismatch, and a group of 28 other HLA mismatches (38%) that showed similar associations with TRM.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that HLA mismatches that do not alter peptide binding or orientation (Peptide Score = 0) could expand the number of permissive HLA mismatches. Further investigation is needed to confirm this observation and to explore alternative scoring systems for ranking HLA mismatched donors.